Search for: "United States v. Thomas Casey" Results 21 - 40 of 163
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2018, 10:37 pm by Anthony Gaughan
” But, somewhat ironically, he made that statement in his concurring opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 10:42 am by Eric Segall
Justice Thomas asked numerous times about women endangering their fetuses through drug use or negligent conduct and whether states can deal with that problem appropriately. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:13 am by SHG
United States, 293 F. 1013 [1923]), held that Ofshe's theories have not gained "general acceptance in the scientific community," and refused to allow him to testify for the defense. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 5:58 pm by Samuel Bray
One could quibble with the Seventh Circuit order, which refers to the injunction as "STAYED as to geographic areas in the United States beyond the City of Chicago" [emphasis added]; footnote 1 of Justice Thomas's opinion is more precise, distinguishing places and parties. [read post]
3 May 2022, 7:33 am by Michael C. Dorf
It then also notes that the plaintiffs and the United States as amicus had connected the abortion right to the right of consenting adults to engage in same-sex sexual conduct (recognized in Lawrence v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 4:21 am by David Oscar Markus
”Prelogar, arguing for the United States in support of Jackson Women’s Health, says, “The real-world effects of overruling Roe and Casey would be severe and swift. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 8:30 am by JB
” Justice Alito argues that stare decisis should not require the Court to keep Casey, because, among other reasons, there has been no reliance on the right to abortion in the United States. [read post]
23 May 2008, 10:17 am
Casey and new lows in its indifference to the evidentiary record in Stenberg v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 1:06 am
Five members of the United States Supreme Court voted to disallow partial-birth abortions. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 9:00 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
Casey survived in that year’s Texas case, Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:13 am by John Knepper
In dissent, Justice Clarence Thomas points out that, just two months ago, in Ramos v. [read post]
26 May 2013, 6:52 am by Jeff Gamso
”  The office relied on training from the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, he said, adding, “It’s obvious it received bad training from the federal government. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 10:27 am
  In this context the necessary and proper clause should be interpreted as Justice Thomas advocated in Sabri v. [read post]