Search for: "United States v. Westfall"
Results 21 - 40
of 57
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2018, 10:16 am
Westfall, 2015 ONCA 810.It is important for Ontario residents to realize that they may need an Ontario car accident injury lawyer, even if they have hired a personal injury lawyer in the United States. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 4:43 pm
In the recent case of United States District Court v. [read post]
21 May 2017, 10:41 am
United States, 396 U.S. 1, 7 (1962). [read post]
4 May 2017, 8:34 am
” For this claim, Jawad relied on United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:37 pm
That’s what the law was under the Westfall v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 8:48 am
Border Patrol agents in seizing individuals at and near the United States-Mexico border. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 10:59 am
"), United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 4:24 am
However, the Westfall Act mandates that the United States be substituted as defendant for claims against government employees acting within the scope of their employment. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 6:54 am
United States, 976 F. 2d 1328 (9th Cir. 1992). [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
For that purpose we consider the legal position of the subsidiary units of government in the United States and their relationship to federal power. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 9:48 am
Addressing the detainees’ two more minor arguments in brief, the government contends that (1) the panel correctly determined that the defendants were acting within the scope of their employment, such that the United States properly substituted itself for the defendants under the Westfall Act, and that (2) the detainees forfeited any challenge to the dismissal of the “John Doe” defendants by failing to raise the claim in their appellate… [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 6:59 am
Chilicky (1988), had already taken place by the time the Westfall Act was passed. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 7:35 am
” As for the international law claims, the government alleges that “[t]he district court correctly held that the United States properly substituted itself under the Westfall Act for the individual named defendants on plaintiffs’ international-law claims because the named defendants were acting within the ‘scope of their employment’ at the time of the incidents alleged in the complaints. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 1:10 pm
United States, 404 F.3d 744, 750 (3d Cir. 2005), and dismissal is appropriate only if, accepting all of the facts alleged in the complaint as true, the plaintiff has failed to plead “enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face,” Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 7:10 pm
The government relies, as it did in the court below (and as the district court did), on the 1949 case of United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 9:33 pm
Subsequent judicial interpretation of the Westfall Act confirmed that its grant of tort immunity to federal workers remains viable even when actual recovery against the United States under the FTCA is precluded. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 1:15 pm
New England, 546 U.S. 320, 329 (2006); see also United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:30 am
Alternatively, sovereign immunity applies to Plaintiff’s nonconstitutional claims, as the Westfall Act provides that the United States is the proper defendant for these claims and the Government has not waived sovereign immunity here. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:30 am
Alternatively, sovereign immunity applies to Plaintiff’s nonconstitutional claims, as the Westfall Act provides that the United States is the proper defendant for these claims and the Government has not waived sovereign immunity here. [read post]
