Search for: "Universal Contracting Corp. v. Aug" Results 21 - 40 of 69
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2018, 10:56 am by Schachtman
ABERRANT DECISIONS The Daubert trilogy and the statutory revisions to Rule 702 have not brought universal enlightenment. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 12:22 pm by Patent Litigation Group
”[v]In most cases, a party will only be able to rely on a force majeure clause where it can demonstrate that as a result of the triggering event it would be impossible to perform as required under the contract. [read post]
28 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Attorneys practicing in this area will want to keep abreast of developments and think ahead as to how risk may be mitigated by contract. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
"[3] But, first, such retaliation is only illegal when done because of certain kinds of claims, and not many other employment claims (such as breach of contract claims). [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
  That is the great tragedy, for example, in the current litigation among the former university President, the former university general counsel and the university over the role of the general counsel and the character of advice she provided. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:42 pm
See, e.g., Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 7:05 am by Eugene Volokh
Aug. 30, 2017), cites various opinions but "takes no position" on the dispute. aPriori Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
  Especially now that millions of formerly uninsured persons (and potential plaintiffs) have obtained insurance through our quasi-universal health care insurance system, the gap between what health care providers nominally bill for services and what they actually accept as payment in full for those services is huge. [read post]