Search for: "Vazquez Contractor"
Results 21 - 40
of 42
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2020, 4:07 pm
San Gabriel Transit, Inc. pending its disposition of Vazquez v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 8:36 am
At the request of the Ninth Circuit, the California Supreme Court will decide whether Dynamex applies retroactively in Vazquez v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
How Independent Contractors are Taxed When engaging in service work, most gig economy workers are treated as independent contractors under federal labor and tax law. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
In another case, Vazquez v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
In another case, Vazquez v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 5:08 am
On July 22, 2019, the Ninth Circuit withdrew its recent decision in Vazquez v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 10:47 am
On May 2, 2019, in Vazquez v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 10:38 am
As previously reported, the U.S Ninth Circuit then ruled that the ABC test applied retroactively (Vazquez v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 1:00 pm
Unless they are exposed, and ICE and its contractors held accountable, it’s all too likely the abuses will continue. [read post]
16 May 2019, 8:49 am
A federal district court applied a standard different from the ABC test and determined the workers in Vazquez were independent contractors. [read post]
15 May 2019, 4:30 am
A wage and hour case before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Vazquez v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 12:25 pm
Gerardo Vazquez, a unit franchisee, sued Jan-Pro alleging he and other similarly situated unit franchisees were misclassified as independent contractors. [read post]
7 May 2019, 11:56 am
On May 2, 2019, the Ninth Circuit found that Dynamex applies retroactively under California law in Vazquez v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 10:42 am
Employers should carefully check agreements with their contractors against the ABC test, including the three Prong B tests discussed in Vazquez, to ensure they are properly classifying employees. [read post]
3 May 2019, 6:51 am
Moreover, California appellate courts apply intervening state supreme court rules retroactively when reviewing cases, even if the judgment in the trial court was entered prior to the supreme court ruling (Vazquez v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 10:52 am
In Vazquez v. [read post]
9 Jul 2016, 8:30 am
Further, the Thruway did not make adjustments for payments to MWBE prime contractors who, in turn, paid other MWBE contractors as subcontractors, resulting in a double-counting of payments.State falls short in verifying if companies qualify for tax breaks under Excelsior ProgramEmpire State Development Corp. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 4:07 am
See, Vazquez v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 6:39 pm
The plaintiffs in the AHRI case are HVAC trade associations and contractors. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 7:26 am
The New York Times, September 15, 2010 Wednesday, Late Edition - Final, Section A; Column 0; Metropolitan Desk; Pg. 26, 644 words, Contractor With $100,000 Belt Buckle Is Found Guilty, By A. [read post]
