Search for: "Vessels v. Social Security Administration"
Results 21 - 40
of 54
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2020, 4:09 pm
Surveillance The Local had a piece “Drones and surveillance cameras: France’s new security bill explained”. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 7:35 am
Washington and the Passenger Vessel ruling by the Supreme Court affirming Judge Boldt. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 11:01 am
Each month of collective national quarantine cost $150-$300 billion, in addition to compounding social costs of unemployment and social unrest. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am
The last point reveals that neither their national security nor their criminal justice systems is at risk of collapsing due to the increasing “civilianization” of military justice. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 2:40 pm
(This op-ed was first published in Just Security on April 13, 2020.) [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 12:36 pm
State Bd. of Health (1902) (upholding Louisiana's right to quarantine passengers aboard vessel—even where all were healthy—against a Fourteenth Amendment challenge); Prince v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of McMorrow v Hevesi, 6 AD3d 925, the Appellate Division said that it has only recognized "active duty, which excludes temporary and intermittent . . . service in any reserve . . . force," for purposes of claiming member service credit pursuant to Retirement and Social Security Law §1000 and Military Law §243(1)(b). [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 11:01 am
District Court for the District of Columbia’s ruling in United States of America v. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 5:08 am
Circuit ruled in the case of Qassim v. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 2:28 pm
“(v) Section 111(b), relating to assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers or employees using a deadly or dangerous weapon or inflicting bodily injury. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 2:13 pm
Berryhill (March 18): Whether, if the Social Security Administration’s Appeals Council determines that an appeal from an administrative decision by an individual seeking disability benefits is filed too late, that ruling is a “final decision” that courts can review Cochise Consultancy v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am
Activists have taken to redress the problem by advocating for nugatory “warnings” from remote suppliers, in the face of employer failures to monitor and supervise workers and the workplace, and to provide administrative, engineering, and personal protective controls. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 1:08 pm
He is now 67 and suffers from vascular dementia, cannot remember the crime he was convicted of, has dead brain tissue, small vessel ischemia, slurred speech, can no longer walk on his own, and is incontinent. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 11:53 am
The U.N. banned four North Korean ships from visiting any port worldwide after finding the vessels violated Security Council sanctions, according to the BBC. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 8:33 am
@POTUS is a digital metonym for the office of the Presidency: a vessel filled in turn by each new occupant. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 1:45 pm
(Chris Ratcliffe/Bloomberg) The Supreme Court has just agreed to hear Packingham v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 4:21 pm
Unsurprisingly, this conflicts with the Supreme Court’s precedents (such as City of Ladue v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 8:00 am
O’Keefe v Caldwell (1949) Argus Law Reports 381. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Professor Gibson’s comprehensive history of the Court waves together the legal history of the Red River with its social, economic and political history. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:12 pm
Referring to counter-terrorism cases and relevant public protocols in the UK, his presentation demonstrated the complexity of state secrets, the supervision of security intelligence agencies, and the tension between human rights and national security. [read post]