Search for: "Vest v. Receivables Performance Management LLC"
Results 21 - 33
of 33
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2014, 8:25 am
EEOC v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am
A(b) Prior to sending ... any child ... into a receiving state for placement in foster care or as a preliminary to a possible adoption, the sending agency shall furnish the appropriate public authorities in the receiving state written notice ...@ (emphasis added). [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 2:38 am
These restrictions can be a trap for the ill-informed, as emphasized by a recent Brooklyn appeals court decision in Camuso v Brooklyn Portfolio, LLC, 164 AD3d 739 [2d Dept 2018]. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
Bay Area Air Quality Management District (2016) 2 Cal.App.5th 1067. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
Pursuant to the ICWA, A[a]n Indian tribe shall have jurisdiction exclusive as to any State over any child custody proceeding involving an Indian child who resides or is domiciled within the reservation of such tribe, except where such jurisdiction is otherwise vested in the State by existing Federal law@ (25 USC ' 1911[a] ). [read post]
Divorcing Husband Not Smiling Over Court’s Rejection of Ownership Interest in Wife’s Dental Practice
6 Nov 2017, 3:31 am
The wife’s total contribution, according to the husband, was limited to “infrequently performed garden-variety dental services” working “at most two days per week” and generating less than 5% of practice revenues. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 6:09 pm
Two other footnotes contain important observations of Delaware law that are especially worth remembering: (1) The management of an LLC is vested in proportion to the then-current percentage or other interest of members in the profits of the LLC owned by all the members, and “the decision of members owning more than 50% of the said percentage or other interest in the profits [is] controlling. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in Viacom… [read post]
[Josh Blackman] The PROMESA Board Members Are Not "Officers of the United States." So What Are They?
10 Jun 2020, 11:31 am
Aurelius Investment, LLC. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
Golden Door Properties LLC v. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 7:28 pm
Instead, they can be sued only to perform statutorily-delegated duties through an action in mandamus. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
As a result, the 2nd Circuit would now address the legal issue that copyrights in pre-1972 sound recordings didn't cover the right to exclusive public performance - a position successfully challenged by Turtle's musicians Flo & Eddie who filed filed 2013 lawsuits in California, Florida and New York. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 8:48 pm
In Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
