Search for: "WAFERS v. STATE"
Results 21 - 40
of 59
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2021, 9:37 pm
See Loretto v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 11:26 am
by Dennis Crouch A discussion of Lelo v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 8:48 am
O'Brien v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 7:58 am
See, Stevens v Wafer . [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 11:38 am
The case Energizer Battery v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 12:21 pm
” Aspex’s efforts to distinguish Scholle, as well as the 1993 case of Wafer Shave, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 5:15 pm
United StatesUnited States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 7:18 am
The state of Oklahoma, through Attorney General Mike Hunter, joined a 20-state amicus brief led by the state of Texas in support of the petitioners, a bakery corporation and its owner, in Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
25 May 2014, 7:50 am
David gave examples from Kohler Mira v Bristan Group [2013] EWPCC 2, Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited & Another v Apple Inc. [2012] EWHC 1882 and Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited & Another v Apple Inc. [2012] EWCA Civ 1339 where dotted lines were held to indicate transparency. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 1:11 pm
To date, there have been 26 deaths and more than 400 injuries in the United States, due to this defect. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 6:13 am
Touchpoint Communications, LLC v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 3:22 pm
Then there was KSR v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 6:47 am
The Court of Appeal stated that since patent law already protected products and manufacturing process, such processes should not be protected by trade mark law. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:09 am
Aspex Eyewear Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 3:25 pm
The shape in issue is essentially that of the well-known Kit Kat four-finger chocolate-coated wafer bar. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 9:02 am
United States 54 USPQ2d 1519, 1530 (Ct. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 7:40 am
For example, the ruling coalitions in both the states of Kerala and Uttarakhand have a wafer-thin majority. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 8:14 am
The appeals court, however, affirmed summary judgment as to her state law retaliation claim based on the filing of a workers’ comp claim, where the company did not provide her worker’s comp coverage and there was no evidence that the staffing agency acted with a retaliatory motive (Burton v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 6:01 am
In Alabama Association of Realtors v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 2:25 am
This is what the General Court concluded, referring to Case T-418/07 LIBRO v OHIM – Causley (LiBRO), and confirming the approach adopted in Specsavers. [read post]