Search for: "WHITTEN v. WHITTEN" Results 21 - 40 of 48
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2010, 7:11 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
**Also**Nick Morelli: I can't ask questions I don't know the answers to, that's lawyering 101.In the Whitten case (the episode is captioned: Whitten v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 5:21 am by Jack Bogdanski
Ghandour's endorsers then included Tina Kotek, Val Hoyle, Susheela Jayapal, Jessica Vega Pederson, Janelle Bynum, Tawna Sanchez, and Cameron Whitten. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 6:00 am by Lisa Stam
Justice Whitten, perhaps also a lover of legal tech, agreed. [read post]
6 May 2010, 12:56 pm by danlublin
However, the Ontario Court of Appeal changed that law in a case called Wroko v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 11:49 am
Whitten, 56 M.J. 234, 236 (C.A.A.F. 2002) (quoting United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 5:58 am
Whitten, 706 F.2d 1000, 1016 (9th Cir. 1983) (finding officer’s entry into room without specific request or consent unlawful); United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 5:09 am by cdw
Whitten (Ronell Wilson) the Second Circuit granted penalty phase relief on direct appeal. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
Justice Whitten of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice attracted considerable attention last year for his suggestion in Cass v. 1410088 Ontario Inc. that time billed for legal research could have been reduced “if artificial intelligence sources were employed. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 6:50 am by admin
In re Whitten (Bankr D Mass 1996) 192 BR 15; King v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
Despite Justice Whitten’s admonishment in Cass v. 1410088 Ontario Inc. that “[i]f artificial intelligence sources were employed, no doubt counsel’s preparation time would have been significantly reduced”, it is difficult to identify an AI-empowered legal research tool that all Canadian litigators should be using as a matter of basic competence. [read post]