Search for: "WILL SCIENTIFIC"
Results 21 - 40
of 34,826
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2023, 8:56 am
If truth is a complete defense to a defamation action, what about “scientific truth”? [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 4:04 pm
certain epistemic problems facing courts by creating an "Office of Scientific Adjuncts," which would provide disinterested scientific experts to help judges evaluate scientific evidence more accurately and efficiently. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 6:21 am
Scientific knowledge is not easily described in terms of truthor falsity. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:54 am
<> Our Commitment to Scientific Integrity at EPA - Francesca Grifo, Ph.D., EPA's Scientific Integrity Officer, announced the release of EPA's Fiscal Year 2014 Scientific Integrity Annual Report. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 4:09 am
Boston Scientific said it planned to reduce [...] [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 9:10 am
David Bernstein offers interesting comments on scientific evidence in the U.S. in this blog post. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
Retractions of articles from scientific journals have been climbing at a staggering rate. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 11:59 pm
In the latest development in the Star Scientific v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 6:44 am
Judge Denies Motion of Summary Judgment in Boston Scientific Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuit Boston Scientific is one of six transvaginal mesh manufacturers that face thousands of personal injury lawsuits related to their products. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 2:50 pm
Tens of thousands of Boston Scientific catheters recalled due to breakage risk. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 8:07 am
First Bellwether Trial Against Boston Scientific Goes to Transvaginal Mesh Manufacturer Boston Scientific has won their first bellwether trial involving their transvaginal mesh devices when a Massachusetts jury rejected the plaintiff’s claims of faulty design. [read post]
14 May 2013, 11:53 pm
Boston Scientific Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits In 2003, Boston Scientific settled 738 lawsuits arising from Protegen. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 3:22 pm
This new epistemology of scientific evidence (ESE) models scientific knowledge as achieved through a process of marshaling evidence in a scientific inquiry that results in a convergence of scientific theories and research results. [read post]
12 May 2013, 11:49 pm
One such manufacturer is Boston Scientific. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 7:47 pm
Here is the abstract: This paper focuses on the question of how decision makers with no relevant scientific background can (if at all) legitimately evaluate conflicting scientific expert testimonies of and determine their relative reliability. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:37 pm
,” 59 Scientific American 355, 355 (Dec. 8, 1888). [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 9:04 am
Read a discussion of the incidence of retractions, and what to do about it, by publishers of a couple of scientific journals here. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 1:03 pm
Metaphor is useful, but not essential, to scientific work; metaphors don’t have a special kind of meaning, but they do have a special pragmatic role; scientific work and the writing of fiction do have important things in common, but there are also significant differences between the two enterprises. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 1:03 pm
Metaphor is useful, but not essential, to scientific work; metaphors don’t have a special kind of meaning, but they do have a special pragmatic role; scientific work and the writing of fiction do have important things in common, but there are also significant differences between the two enterprises. [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 12:29 pm
Chronicle noted of a report by Harold Garner discussed in Science: The survey published in Science, while anonymous, prompted 83 internal investigations at scientific journals, which in turn led to 43 cases in which an article was retracted.ScienceNews discussed the article in Science on plagiarism:Suppose author #1 reported that in a few experimental trials, drug therapy worked as well as surgery. [read post]
