Search for: "Wade, Appeal of" Results 21 - 40 of 1,865
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2024, 5:57 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Wade because it was not “deeply rooted in the Nation’s history and tradition. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 6:20 am by Howard Bashman
Wade Have Come True; Republicans were quick to wave away the political consequences; Now that they’ve arrived, they have no answers” appeared first on How Appealing. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 10:40 am by Howard Bashman
Wade to its ultimate protector; Abortion is at the center of President Joe Biden’s re-election campaign — an improbability for a politician who long expressed his personal discomfort with the practice” appeared first on How Appealing. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 4:58 pm by Edward T. Kang and Kyle T. Garabedian
If so, after a long and costly appeal the applicant may still be at square one. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Berger
Wade, and while the standard is hopelessly subjective, its basic premise has some appeal. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 1:36 pm by Howard Bashman
Wade, was now enforceable, but put its decision on hold for a lower court to hear other challenges to the law. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Wade, but now that Roe has been overruled, it is difficult to see why that matters. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:32 am by Michael C. Dorf
Wade--was a Burger Court decision, as was its compromise ruling on affirmative action, Regents of the Univ. of California v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 8:33 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  As Merpel was wading through the usual analysis, she stumbled across a novel topic in a post from her Parisian Kat friend, Lionel Martin (August-Debouzy) posing the question as to whether the Court of Appeal's panel composition is in breach of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) - and whether anyone would care enough to challenge it.Over to Lionel:"Since its opening this June 1, 2023, very few cases have reached the appeal level, and even fewer… [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 1:18 pm by Stuart Kaplow
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit refused to reconsider its 2023 ruling that the ban is “without effect” as preempted by Federal law under the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. [read post]
” In the appeal, Justice Wade Birdwell said the state did not meet its burden of proving that Mason both knew she was on supervised release and that she “actually realized” that this circumstance made her ineligible to vote. [read post]