Search for: "Walker v. Scott*" Results 21 - 40 of 343
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2012, 4:50 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
In Courtroom 1 this morning until Tuesday 10 July 2012 is the appeal of BCL Old Co Ltd & ors v BASF plc & ors, to be heard by Lords Phillips, Walker, Mance, Clarke, and Wilson. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am by Blog Editorial
  This will be heard by Lord Walker, Lady Hale and Lords Mance, Collins and Clarke. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 2:03 pm by scottgaille
  He went to law school at the University of Texas and went on to serve as Huntsville City Attorney, Walker County Attorney, and Walker County Judge. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 3:41 am by Amy Howe
On Friday the Court issued the first set of orders from its December 5 Conference, granting cert. in three cases:  Walker v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 4:12 am by Blog Editorial
This week, the Supreme Court will consider the linked appeals of R (Davies & Anor) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs and R (Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs which are to be heard on Wednesday 6 and Thursday 7 July 2011 by Lords Hope, Walker, Mance, Clarke and Wilson. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 8:07 am
Part II: The Scottish Independence Referendum 2014Part III: Thematic AnalysisPart IV: The 2012–13 Legal Year in OverviewPart V: Composition and Statistics [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:23 am by Amy Howe
  The first oral argument was in Walker v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 1:45 am by Laura Sandwell
Running from Monday 16 July 2012 until Wednesday 18 July 2012 in the Supreme Court are the linked appeals of Day & anor v Hosebay Ltd and Howard de Walden Estates Ltd v Lexgorge Ltd, in front of a panel of seven (L Phillips,L Walker, L Mance, L Clarke, L Wilson, L Sumption and L Carnwath). [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:49 am
  The bill also legislatively overturns the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s controversial Thomas v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 11:31 am by Lyle Denniston
The denial of review in O’Keefe v. [read post]