Search for: "Walker v. State of Kansas" Results 21 - 40 of 45
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2006, 6:58 am
Kansas Supreme Court January 29 to February 1, 2007Monday, January 29, 2007A.M.State v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 12:24 pm by Erin Miller
Brown (2007)), and allowed state supreme courts that had promised to review death sentencing patterns to stop doing so (Walker v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
”Id. at 1141-42 (various citations omitted).Courts in other states following this general approach are:  Haygood v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Comment k could correspond to Led Zeppelin, and state of the art might be The Who.And it seems that, for each of these bands, there’s a song we really like that gets slighted (in our opinion) when it comes to air time on classic rock stations. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 12:27 am by legalinformatics
Miller, Penn State University: Rhetoric and Judicial Activism: The Case of Hillary Goodridge v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-9151, Walker v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am by John Elwood
In the last couple of Conferences, when multiple cases have presented the same issue for the Court’s review, the Court has tipped its hand about its preferred vehicle before the actual grant by relisting it and “holding” the runner up (see, e.g., Walker v. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
But after the 1854 Kansas-Nebraska Act was passed, he became more vocal. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
(Alabama), Clive Walker (Leeds, England), Russell L. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
 At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by jonathanturley
However, it is a modified comparative negligence state so they must show that they are 50 percent or less at fault. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:41 am by Mirriam Seddiq
  Speaking of dead and communication.In a decision that basically all but over-ruled their decision in Crawford v. [read post]