Search for: "Wang v Zhang"
Results 21 - 40
of 65
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2022, 6:46 am
References[+] References ↑1 (i) Kyowa Pharmaceutical Industry Co., Ltd., (ii) Nichi-Iko Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., (iii) Nipro Corporation, (iv) Towa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., (v) Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd. and (vi) Ohara Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.More from our authors: Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention 2021 Edition by Laurence Lai, Derk Visser, Peter de Lange, Kaisa Suominen€ 105 … [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 12:44 am
The report mentions that there is only one precedent rendered over five years ago in Japan, in 2013 in Apple v Samsung. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 6:41 am
V & T (Zhang Zi, Proficient in English Conversation, Hong Kong educated) _________ SeanHayes@ipglegal.comIPG is engaged in projects in Bangladesh, Cambodia, China, Korea, Laos, Myanmar, Vietnam and the U.S. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 4:30 am
The judge considered the factors on secondary indications set out by Laddie J in Haberman v Jackel [1999] F.S.R. 683 (and approved by Jacob LJ in Schlumberger v Electromagnetic Geoservices [2010] EWC Civ 819). [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 4:33 pm
Swan€ 112 Chinese Patent Law: A Practical Guide by Sun Changlong, Zhang Junjie, Fanwen Kong, Dang Li, Yongbo Li, Zhang Liang (William), Wang Meng, Zhang Qiulin, Wang Rong, Gu Runfeng, Chen Shasha, Lu Weiting, Ge Xiaomei, Yang Yang, He Yibo€ 148 [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 12:36 pm
Wang, the book is co-authored by Jones Day antitrust partners Sebastien Evrard and former MOFCOM official Yizhe Zhang, based in Jones Day’s Hong Kong and Beijing offices, respectively, and associate Baohui Zhang. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:59 am
Swan€ 112 Chinese Patent Law: A Practical Guide by Sun Changlong, Zhang Junjie, Fanwen Kong, Dang Li, Yongbo Li, Zhang Liang (William), Wang Meng, Zhang Qiulin, Wang Rong, Gu Runfeng, Chen Shasha, Lu Weiting, Ge Xiaomei, Yang Yang, He Yibo€ 148 [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 12:36 am
Swan€ 112 Chinese Patent Law: A Practical Guide by Sun Changlong, Zhang Junjie, Fanwen Kong, Dang Li, Yongbo Li, Zhang Liang (William), Wang Meng, Zhang Qiulin, Wang Rong, Gu Runfeng, Chen Shasha, Lu Weiting, Ge Xiaomei, Yang Yang, He Yibo€ 148 [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:57 am
Swan€ 112 Chinese Patent Law: A Practical Guide by Sun Changlong, Zhang Junjie, Fanwen Kong, Dang Li, Yongbo Li, Zhang Liang (William), Wang Meng, Zhang Qiulin, Wang Rong, Gu Runfeng, Chen Shasha, Lu Weiting, Ge Xiaomei, Yang Yang, He Yibo€ 148 [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 6:48 am
Mass. 2019). [2] Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2014, 6:53 am
Case six: Zhang Hongjun v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:36 am
More from our authors: Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention 2021 Edition by Laurence Lai, Derk Visser, Peter de Lange, Kaisa Suominen€ 105 Chinese Patent Law: A Practical Guide by Sun Changlong, Zhang Junjie, Fanwen Kong, Dang Li, Yongbo Li, Zhang Liang (William), Wang Meng, Zhang Qiulin, Wang Rong, Gu… [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 3:58 am
More from our authors: Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention 2021 Edition by Laurence Lai, Derk Visser, Peter de Lange, Kaisa Suominen€ 105 Chinese Patent Law: A Practical Guide by Sun Changlong, Zhang Junjie, Fanwen Kong, Dang Li, Yongbo Li, Zhang Liang (William), Wang Meng, Zhang Qiulin, Wang Rong, Gu… [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 6:09 am
Swan€ 112 Chinese Patent Law: A Practical Guide by Sun Changlong, Zhang Junjie, Fanwen Kong, Dang Li, Yongbo Li, Zhang Liang (William), Wang Meng, Zhang Qiulin, Wang Rong, Gu Runfeng, Chen Shasha, Lu Weiting, Ge Xiaomei, Yang Yang, He Yibo€ 148 [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 8:26 am
., Ltd v The NOCO Company, a case on battery-powered car jump starters. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:12 pm
Yi Zhang echoed Connor’s ideas of mutual influence between the East and the West. [read post]
22 May 2023, 8:33 am
Olivier T, Haslam A, Prasad V. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 7:09 pm
Ltd v. 99 Trade Co. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 4:38 am
“ As regards the 3(c) issue, this provision has been largely left undisturbed since the rulings of the court in Sanofi v Actavis[2] and Boehringer Ingelheim v Actavis[3] which held that even if Article 3(a) was satisfied, in circumstances where a basic patent included a claim to a product comprising an active ingredient which constituted the sole subject matter of the invention and for which the holder of that patent had already obtained an SPC as well as a subsequent claim… [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:56 am
Genentech v. [read post]
