Search for: "Warner v. Denis" Results 21 - 40 of 516
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am by Bernard Bell
Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597-98 (1978),[1] much like FOIA requesters need have no particular reason to obtain government records. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
IPSO 10070-22 Warner, Eddleston & Eddleston v mirror.co.uk, 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), No breach – after investigation 10067-22 Warner, Eddleston & Eddleston v Mail Online, 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), No breach – after investigation Resolution Statement – 10893-22 Lund v westerntelegraph.co.uk, 1 Accuracy, Resolved – IPSO… [read post]
The UK Privy Council Thursday dismissed former FIFA vice president Jack Warner’s appeal against a US extradition request in the USA v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm by INFORRM
   Dissenting, Phillips LJ described the approach of the majority as “unprincipled,” remarking that it would be “unfortunate” if the Appellant “having been denied a fair trial in Bangladesh in 2013 … was now prevented from having access to the courts of this jurisdiction. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:03 am by Robert B. Milligan
Accordingly, summary judgment was denied as to plaintiff’s claims for trade secret misappropriation. [read post]
18 May 2022, 2:07 pm by NARF
Supreme Court Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2021-2022update.htmlOne petition for certiorari was denied this week on 5/6/22: Albrecht v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
ExxonMobil Aims to Use a Radical Texas Law to Silence Its Critics – in California Mother Jones – Chris McGreal | Published: 1/18/2022 ExxonMobil is attempting to use an unusual Texas law to target and intimidate its critics, claiming lawsuits against the company over its long history of downplaying and denying the climate crisis violate the U.S. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 2:52 am by Giorgio Luceri
A New York court found that the composers had not been negatively affected by the use of their compositions or names in the film and described the use of the music as incidental, concluding, however, that in US law, “the existence of a right of integrity is not clear”.A famous case in the UK is Confetti Records v Warner Music UK Ltd, involving a piece of UK garage music composed by Andrew Alcee entitled 'Burnin' and released on Confetti Records. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 12:26 am by Rose Hughes
(T 966/18)New referral expected to the EBA on the use of post-published data to support inventive stepPlausibility in the UKNo pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v ActavisSupreme Court unanimously dismisses Warner-Lambert's painful Lyrica appealTakeda v Roche: "Is it plausible? [read post]
4 Sep 2021, 3:32 am by SHG
Warner’s situation, they are often decided with no explanation. [read post]