Search for: "Water District No. 1 v. Kansas Water Authority"
Results 21 - 40
of 56
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
The agreement also is significant because it documents EPA’s recognition and approval of West Virginia’s program and the DEP’s capabilities and authorities for addressing cleanups under the state program. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 7:04 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia’s decision in Blue Water Navy Vietnam Veterans Association Inc. and Military-Veterans Advocacy Inc. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
Thornburg had ordered the Tennessee Valley Authority to accelerate its planned emission control improvements at the four plants — a demand that TVA said would cost an additional $1 billion. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
District Court in Roanoke. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm
The district court and U.S. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
Mary’s, Kansas. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
Click Here Port Manatee tenant paying $1 million air pollution penalty. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
That means elevating buildings, making taller and stronger dams and seawalls, rerouting water systems, restricting certain developments, changing farming practices, and ultimately moving people, plants, and animals out of harm’s way. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
Idaho 1/1/19 FAGI FTI Illinois Rolling FTI FTI Indiana 1/1/19 FAGI FTI before NOLs and special deds. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
March 26, 2014) (District of Columbia) (non-product liability). [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
District Court Judge Frederick J. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 3:35 pm
John Deere Co. of Kansas City, 383 U.S. 1, 17-18 (1966), the court must consider (1) the scope and content of the prior art; (2) the difference between the prior art and the claimed invention; (3) the level of ordinary skill in the art; and (4) any objective evidence of nonobviousness. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
Pix Credit hereESG, has been driven by the private sector and intensely debated in the context of privately ordered responsible business conduct standards, and formed part of a rich debates among market actors and public international organizations about the role and nature of so-called non-financial siclosure in genmeral, and sustainability and climate related factors in decision making. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:42 pm
— Imelda V. [read post]
December 21, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
21 Dec 2009, 10:57 am
— Imelda V. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
A few general conclusions can be advanced about this mode of reasoning: 1. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
Army Corps of Engineers and the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago manage the system in a manner that will allow carp to move into the Great Lakes, in violation of the federal common law of public nuisance. [read post]
