Search for: "Watson v. Bear" Results 21 - 40 of 117
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2010, 4:56 am by David Canton
Since one legal tests of trademark infringement is customer confusion, you be the judge: Are the marks confusing enough that customers might think products bearing them are from the same source? [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 4:14 pm by Schachtman
Emory University Hospital, 611 F.2d 604, 608 n. 13 (5th Cir.1980); Watson v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 10:09 am
A party seeking a writ bears the burden of proving that it has no other means of attaining the relief desired, Mallard v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
  While the Privacy and Electronic Communications Directive regulated the behaviour of communications providers generally, Article 1(3) of that Directive specifies that matters covered by Titles V and VI of the TEU at that time (e.g. public security, defence, State security) fall outside the scope of the directive, which the Court described as relating to “activities of the State” . [read post]
10 May 2024, 1:54 pm by Gene Killian
After all, the insurance company wrote the policy, and should bear the risk of the language being susceptible of more than one construction. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 6:24 am by Antonin I. Pribetic
Image via elliemencer.com I previously blogged about Cojocaru (Guardian Ad Litem) v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:59 am by Jane Chong
Yesterday afternoon, the Fourth Circuit, sitting en banc, heard two hours of argument in IRAP v. [read post]