Search for: "Watts v. Victory"
Results 21 - 40
of 46
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court denied a request from the Center for Individual Rights (CIR) to rehear Friedrichs v. [read post]
15 May 2016, 9:01 pm
Michael brought in Steven Watt, a young Scottish lawyer who had recently joined the staff at CCR. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 6:11 am
By Tom Watts Yesterday, the Supreme Court decided National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:17 pm
By Tom Watts A California trial court judge decided in Vergara v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 3:35 pm
The litigation industry’s victory is memorialized in the “Final Minutes of Meetings of the APHA Governing Council, ” held in November 2004, when the industry’s attack on evidence-based science and data transparency, known as “Policy Number: 2004-11 Threats to Public Health Science,” was adopted as an APHA policy statement. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 3:10 am
Watts. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 8:13 pm
Once again the focus of the lecture was on litigants in landmark twentieth-century cases – this time, the petitioners in the 1969 case Tinker v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:19 pm
Oklahoma Bar Association v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:13 pm
Last week, in a non-employment dispute, a divided High Court handed a victory to parties seeking to avoid class arbitration when it ruled, in American Express Co v Italian Colors Restaurant, that courts may not invalidate class arbitration waivers merely because a plaintiff’s cost of arbitrating a dispute individually would exceed the potential recovery. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 6:43 pm
Yesterday, the Missouri Supreme Court in Watts v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 4:25 am
The NLRB lacked a quorum of board members when it published its rule amending its representation election procedures on December 16, 2011, and the challenged rule is therefore invalid, the District of Columbia federal district court held, in a perhaps tepid — and temporary — victory for opponents of what has been dubbed the board’s “quickie” or “ambush” election rule (Chamber of Commerce of the United States v NLRB, May 14, 2012, Boasberg,… [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 9:44 am
Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: 9th Circuit, Eternal Damnation, Filarsky & Watt LLP, Filarsky v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 3:18 am
Watts, No. 5:11-cv-00048 (W.D. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 3:56 am
Watts. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 2:52 am
Watts. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 2:41 am
Watts On that same day, President Eisenhower sent a letter to the Honorable Harvey V. [read post]
Why Virginia will not be invited to the dance (the Supreme Court battle over the individual mandate)
17 Oct 2011, 8:15 pm
See, e.g., Watt v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:39 pm
Questioning was extensive and included questions from subcommittee Chairman Goodlatte (R-VA), Vice-Chairman Watt (D-NC), and Representatives Conyers (D-Mich), Nadler (D-NY), Chu (D-CA), Reed (R-NY), and Adams (R-FL). [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 4:12 am
V. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:34 pm
" In re Watts, 354 F.3d 1362, 1369 (Fed. [read post]
