Search for: "Wells v. State of California" Results 21 - 40 of 12,222
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2024, 1:25 pm by Josh Blackman
For example, he was the brainchild behind the Obamacare challenge that became known as California v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:17 am by INFORRM
There were 20 other adults; 15 men and 5 women, as well as 1 child. [read post]
23 May 2024, 3:00 am by Yosi Yahoudai
(Brian van der Brug / Los Angeles Times) Ryan King, a spokesman for the office of the University of California’s president, Michael V. [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The recent California district court decision dismissing the complaint in X Corp. v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:20 am by Dennis Crouch
  At the same time, the decision departs somewhat from the several California cases, including Cubic Corp. v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:00 am by Yosi Yahoudai
She pointed to California’s plan to establish the first statewide ranking system for heat waves as a positive example, as well as new heat monitoring tools from NOAA and the U.S. [read post]
20 May 2024, 11:41 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
“This lawsuit is a huge victory for our community and ICIJ will continue to do our work so immigrants are well equipped and understand their rights. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
  Justifying Hamas's murderous pogrom by saying Israel deserved what it got is nothing less than supporting a terrorist organization – the same as blaming the United States for 9/11. [read post]
19 May 2024, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
Aug 29, 2023 | Could West Virginia v EPA Strengthen State Climate Laws | Scholars argue that a recent Supreme Court decision may bolster state climate lawsuits. [read post]
17 May 2024, 8:36 am by Eric Goldman
In In Re Jackson, Judge Leval applied this approach to a right of publicity claim, but it is applicable to any state law cause of action, and in X v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm by centerforartlaw
Broderick on August 28.[42] Most recently, in an order filed by United States Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on February 12, 2024, the Court addressed a pending privilege dispute over which state’s law should apply to resolve the documents.[43] Another issue was whether the attorney-client privilege between the Estate and its counsel exten [read post]
13 May 2024, 7:36 am by Eric Goldman
— If the Northern District of California’s recent rulings with Bright Data were a bit of a surprise, its recent decision in the X Corp. v. [read post]