Search for: "White v. South Carolina Tax Commission"
Results 21 - 35
of 35
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2019, 2:32 pm
And in North Carolina Department of Revenue v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm
Newspapers Journalism and Regulation At an EU level the introduction of amendments to copyright law will levy a link tax and charges search engines providing access to copyrighted materials. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 6:52 pm
Supreme Court in Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court in Kokesh v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Breyer, Energy Regulation by the Federal Power Commission (1974) Yet other works that caught my attention, for various reasons, include the following works: William H. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:18 am
Supreme Court stated in its 2010 Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:38 pm
The NLRB filed a complaint against Boeing Corporation for opening a production line in North Charleston, South Carolina, instead of the outskirts of Seattle, Washington, where most of its production was located. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 12:17 pm
Yohn Jr. in Teva v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
– Enviro.BLR.com, May 5, 2010 A major railway company has agreed to pay $4 million penalty to resolve alleged CWA and CERCLA violations for a 2005 chlorine spill in Graniteville, South Carolina. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
(Hydro) to resolve violations of the Clean Water Act (CWA), the Clean Air Act CAA), the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), and the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA), and their implementing regulations at 16 facilities listed below: 249 South 51st Avenue, Phoenix, AZ 85043; 100 Gus Hipp Blvd., Rockledge, FL 32955–4701; 200 Riviera Blvd., St. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 10:26 am
South Carolina in 1832 was political theater. it did some good, mainly because in those days the federal government depended on the cooperation of local officials to some degree, which it no longer does, and because there was a threat of secession (which occurred 29 years later anyway). [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 7:35 am
The lawsuits name dealers in Georgia, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and South Carolina. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Verizon PA Inco o Court Grants Additional Compensation To Plaintiff To Offset Tax LiabilityEshelman v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Innovationpartners) Europe ECJ: No simple test for bad faith trade mark registration: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v Franz Hauswirth GmbH (IPKat) Court of First Instance: Shells all too common in bakery and confectionery sector: G M Piccolo Srl v OHIM (Class 46) European Parliament votes for greater ACTA transparency (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) CTM fees to be reduced (Class 46) (Class 46) (Class 46) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (The IP Factor) (Out-Law)… [read post]
