Search for: "White v. Verizon" Results 21 - 40 of 84
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2009, 10:14 pm
Grokster, 545 U.S. 913 (2005), is surpassingly important to the future of copyright, and opinions like Verizon Comms. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 5:29 pm by The Complex Litigator
The defendant in this particular case is Cellco Partnership (doing business as Verizon Wireless ("Verizon")). [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Marquan http://t.co/MYq3H00FZS -> 23andMe’s Browsewrap Fails, But Its Post-Purchase Clickthrough Works Anyway–Tompkins v. 23andMe http://t.co/DwemQES2F6 -> China blocks Flickr and OneDrive http://t.co/Xwug6mDRn6 -> Weatherley: ‘Cutting off ad revenue to illegal sites is key to piracy battle’ | Music Week http://t.co/FYUoYJZwl5 -> German government to drop Verizon because of US spying http://t.co/LVuJrAnPBN -> Chairman Jean-Pierre Blais… [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 8:32 pm
* Marty reports on a German case saying that white-text-on-a-white-background is a trademark use [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:45 pm
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Obama Administration tells Senate it supports patent reform changes (IP Watch) Patent Reform Act has false marking in its sites (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Patent reform that hurts small inventors and small businesses (Inventive Step) Department of Commerce white paper supports patent reform (Inventive Step) (Patent Docs) (IP Watch) (Patently-O)   US Patents Northern District of Illinois is a top patent district any way you slice it… [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 3:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
The Verizon case: the issue was that Verizon showed AT&T’s 3G’s coverage area, which was smaller than Verizon’s 3G coverage area, but AT&T’s total coverage area was bigger than 3G. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 6:47 am by Clara Spera
ICYMI: This Weekend, on Lawfare The Supreme Court granted certiorari on Friday in OBB Personenverkehr AG v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 10:58 am by William Ford
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in United States v. [read post]