Search for: "White v. Workers' Compensation"
Results 21 - 40
of 412
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2016, 12:22 pm
The cases were DiCarlo v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:18 pm
The case, White v. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 7:12 am
Super. at 398-99 (noting that N.J.S.A. 34:15-36 prescribes just two conditions for the application of the special-mission exception); see also White v. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 6:49 pm
See McDonald v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 6:00 am
The Whiting decision could very well have an effect on workers’ compensation practice. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 12:39 am
If a white employee stands up for her black co-workers, and is then ostracized and called racially-charged names because of it, is she entitled to compensation for the alleged harassment? [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 10:00 am
It then discusses the peculiar history of tort law in the early twentieth century, when the advent of worker’s compensation statutes served to remove many prospective workplace accident suits from the common law tort system, but at the same time tort law continued to grow because of the collapse of the privity bar in suits involving negligently manufactured or defectively designed products. [read post]
28 May 2016, 1:14 pm
It’s there in black and white. [read post]
Robinson Reviews U.S. Supreme Court Case Roberts v. Sea-Land Services and other Work Comp Happenings
19 Mar 2012, 11:30 am
Robinson details aspects of the Supreme Court of the United States Roberts v. [read post]
28 May 2016, 1:14 pm
It’s right there in black and white. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 5:03 am
In White v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 6:10 am
Jeff White v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 12:13 pm
Wentworth v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:00 am
10 Myths and Facts About Workers' Compensation Posted by LexisNexis Workers' Comp Law Community Staff The LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation Law Community and the award-winning blog Work Comp Roundup have teamed up to present some common myths and facts about workers’ compensation. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 4:24 am
Ruttiger, which held there was no common-law bad-faith action in the Lone Star State for workers' compensation claims handling.Likewise, two months after Ruttiger came out, though, the New Jersey Supreme Court held that the state's injured workers do not have a common-law right of action for pain and suffering caused by an insurer's administration of a workers' compensation claim in Stancil v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 12:30 pm
White, 243 U.S. 188, 37 S.Ct. 247, 61 L.Ed. 667 (1917). [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 8:00 am
Essentially, the states are asking the judiciary to overturn a landmark Supreme Court decision Garcia v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 2:16 pm
A high-earning employee is not compensated on a “salary basis” when their paycheck is based solely on a daily rate calculated by the number of days worked, the Supreme Court held in Helix Energy Solutions Grp., Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 3:35 am
Generally, California’s workers’ compensation law prevents work-related injury lawsuits against employers. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 6:52 am
Any questions or comments should be directed to Tracy Green, a very experienced California workers compensation fraud attorney, workers compensation premium fraud attorney, and white collar criminal defense attorney at tgreen@greenassoc.com. [read post]
