Search for: "Williams v. General Motors Corp." Results 21 - 40 of 125
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
Obama attorney-general pick good news for IP, says US Chamber of Commerce (IAM) ‘The future of the patent system’ features four former PTO leaders (Hal Wegner) CAFC to hear oral argument in USPTO v GSK & Tafas 5 December (Anticipate This!) [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 10:24 am
Miles, Posner on Economic Loss in Tort: EVRA Corp v Swiss Bank, 74 U Chi L Rev 1813 (2007) Martha Nussbaum, Carr, Before and After: Power and Sex in Carr v Allison Gas Turbine Division, General Motors Corp, 74 U Chi L Rev 1831 (2007) Randal C. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
The Characteristics of the Most-Litigated Patents’ (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Saving US innovation: more patent funding needed (IP Watchdog) BPAI backlog (Patently-O) Deadline to volunteer for the USPTO peer review pilot program is approaching (Patentably Defined) Check out the new beta test release of the USPTO’s website (Patentably Defined) (Just an Examiner) Second pair of eyes fails innovation in the US (IP Watchdog) USPTO needs improved workflow management (IP… [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  As to them, however, we adhere to our general rule that we don’t do the other side’s research for them.AlabamaThe Alabama Supreme Court held, in E.R. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 3:54 pm
  A short summary of highlights from that article follow: Apollo’s Realogy Corp., owner of the Century 21 and Coldwell Banker real estate brands, and Cerberus’s GMAC LLC, the General Motors Corp. financing arm, are among at least five companies owned by buyout firms that want junk bond investors to swap their securities for as little as 36 cents on the dollar. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 6:00 am
Beechnut Nutrition Corp., 229 Cal.Rptr. 605, 608 (Cal.Ct.App.1986), and the CLRA, see True v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 11:46 am by Beck, et al.
Howmedica Osteonics Corp., 2008 WL 906585 (D. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat)   Global Global – General Moral… [read post]