Search for: "Winston v. United States Attorney General"
Results 21 - 40
of 40
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2012, 6:56 am
The concept of "generally known" information was argued.The issue arose because Watson proposed to use Winston and Strawn in an appeal of a decision in a patent case, and a lawyer (Braden) at Winston and Strawn had once represented Valeant:On appeal, Kasowitz [attorneys for Watson at trial] informed Valeant of Watson's intention to retain Winston & Strawn for this appeal. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 2:02 pm
Yesterday the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit released its opinion in Latif v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm
Biography: Dirk Lasater is a practicing lawyer in Winston-Salem, NC with an interest in intellectual property issues. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 10:39 am
Snyder, The Cobra’s contract: revisiting Dave Parker’s 1979 contract with the Pittsburg Pirates, 5 ALBANY GOVERNMENT LAW REVIEW, 188 (2012)Wayne Stenehjem, & Matthew Sagsveen, Let’s go sue: the Attorney General’s historical perspective on State of North Dakota v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:16 am
mod=googlenews_wsj, on United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:35 am
The Winston-Salem Journal reports on the brief in opposition filed in Forsyth County v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
§ 1983, and in United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
§ 1983, and in United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
§ 1983, and in United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 3:00 am
§ 1983, and in United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 7:39 am
Shur and Trial Attorneys David V. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 9:37 pm
But, Winston Churchill envisaged the United States of Europe. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 1:34 pm
It also has inspired discussion about why the United States' death chambers have shown such an extreme gender imbalance. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:13 am
" - Winston Churchill (United States Constitution, Bill of Rights) © 2006-2009 Sex Offender Issues , All Rights Reserved [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:27 am
In United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:05 am
The only difference discoverable between the two cases is, that each representative of the United States will be elected by five or six thousand citizens; whilst in the individual States, the election of a representative is left to about as many hundreds. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 1:29 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice
Court Explains Sentence Imposed After Guilty Plea On Indictment Charging Illegal Re-Entry
United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 12:51 am
At a hearing this week, Ackerman reserved decision on sanctions and said he would refer the matter to both the state Office of Attorney Ethics and the U.S. [read post]
