Search for: "Word v. Motorola, Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 80
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2016, 10:00 pm
For example, in Motorola Mobility v. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 2:51 am
In May 2013, the Court of Appeal for England and Wales in HTC Europe Co Ltd v Apple Inc.[2013] EWCA Civ 451 [on which see Norman Sierbrasse's guest Katpost here] unanimously affirmed Mr Justice Floyd's decision (in HTC Europe Co Ltd v Apple Inc. [2012] EWHC1789) with respect to the slide-to-unlock patent and held that “all the claims of 022 [Apple’s slide to unlock patent] are obvious in the light of Neonode” (paragraph 363). [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
In the latter category we place Newman v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
In other words, the defendants would, by this supposed inability, be unable to mitigate damages by showing that the alleged harm would have occurred any way, but only later in time. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:50 pm
Motorola, Inc. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 6:15 am
Motorola, Inc., supra. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 6:51 pm
Apple Inc., No. 13-2227 (2d Cir. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:29 am
Motorola, Inc., 218 F. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 8:51 pm
Gemalto sued HTC Corporation, HTC America, Inc., Exedea, Inc., Google, Inc., Motorola Mobility, LLC, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “defendants”) in the Eastern District of Texas, alleging infringement of various claims of the three patents. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 5:30 am
http://t.co/plq3gzTcnD -> Costs order in Warman v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 7:38 am
At least in Germany, the largest European market, there is no eBay v. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 12:39 pm
I didn't expect this to happen, least in the U.S.In certain parts of the world, antitrust professionals admire America as the "cradle of competition law" (for example, you can find those very words in this European Commission document). [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 6:07 am
Note the emphasis on "might" and the breadth of the word "appear". [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Oct. 24, 1996) Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 4:59 am
After Microsoft felt forced for procedural reasons to add Google Inc. to a German patent infringement action originally brought only against its Motorola Mobility subsidiary, a Microsoft v. [read post]
12 May 2013, 5:30 am
http://t.co/5cUgbQBWtB -> Netflix Says It’s ‘Killing’ BitTorrent Traffic http://t.co/VdhC2zWj9M -> Craigslist, Inc. v. 3Taps INC., Dist. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:39 pm
Google, Inc., 2007 U.S. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 10:34 pm
Motorola, Inc. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 3:10 am
Yesterday the initial determination on remand came down in the Motorola v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 10:40 am
Motorola Mobility, U.S. [read post]
