Search for: "Word v. Social Security Administration"
Results 21 - 40
of 917
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2012, 5:41 pm
In Tealer v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 6:47 am
The ALJ decision denying social security benefits is not unusual. [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:00 am
The Social Security Administration (SSA) denied the claim and on appeal an SSA Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) upheld the denial. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 11:06 am
The Court also has some harsh words for one Social Security judge who seems to have reversed the order. [read post]
8 May 2012, 8:53 am
Astrue, the District Court for the Middle District of Florida reviews a battle of medical opinions, explaining that the ultimate decision as to whether a claimant is disabled for Social Security benefits purposes is for the Social Security Administration (SSA), not a medical expert, to decide. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 12:07 pm
Daniel Ortiz, representing the petitioner, Richard Culbertson, an attorney who successfully represented several Social Security disability claimants both before the Social Security Administration and in federal court, argued in favor of a separate cap. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 10:27 pm
Colvin, a case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, involved claimant who was seeking Supplemental Security Income (SSI) from the Social Security Administration (SSA). [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:48 pm
Related blog posts: Social Security Disability and the Trial Work Period - Sipp v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 4:35 am
A NJ Appellate Court upheld that a trial judge's ruling that a decision of the Social Security Administration awarding total disability beenfits did not terminate a workers' compensation order for temporary disability payments. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:54 am
It is plain from the briefing that the great majority of those judges are in the Social Security Administration, though a substantial number of ALJs are scattered throughout other departments. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
Food for Thought: The Social Security Administration brought its own experts to comment on our client’s complaints. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 2:33 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission, they were well aware of the implications the decision holds for the administrative state. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 9:49 am
And the administration would have to decide who that someone is. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 7:23 am
That's plausible -- but color me skeptical that any court would look behind the facially neutral justification advanced by an Administration to the words of a presidential candidate that predate a regulatory change as a ground for invalidating an otherwise lawful program. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 2:39 am
The Defense of Marriage Act of 1996 (DOMA) provides in pertinent part:In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the word "marriage" means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife and the word "spouse" refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or wife.DOMA is a pretty nasty law,… [read post]
22 May 2012, 1:27 pm
The Court then turned to Social Security’s interpretation of the word “child.” In the agency’s view, a third section of the Act — Section 416(h) — must be considered in addition to Sections 402(d) and 416(e). [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 12:17 pm
[i] Social Security Administration, Program Operations Manual System (POMS)- Section SI 00601.062. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 10:01 am
’“ (People v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:34 am
or AOL accounts; Any computers or digital storage devices used by either Plaintiff during and after her employment with Defendant; Emails that pertain in way to this lawsuit; Documents, photographs, or other information concerning Dollar Tree stores or Plaintiff's claims; Any non-privileged communications or documents exchanged between Plaintiff and Trowery; Facebook and/or other social media data; Plaintiff's complete tax returns and all attachments thereto from 2007 to the present; and… [read post]
