Search for: "Working Families Party v. Com."
Results 21 - 40
of 81
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2020, 6:31 am
” Pope v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 3:00 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 12:19 pm
It is a duty of all the parties to seek to cooperate, to ensure that a remote hearing is possible. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 7:55 am
” This overbroad formulation is a far cry from the definition set forth by the Supreme Court in Davis v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 8:24 pm
Anderson’s works also roughly correspond with the advent of the Charter, which pronounces a very explicit and deliberate democratic right for citizens, as follows, 3. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am
When a fee claimant seeks to recover attorney's fees from an opposing party, it must put on evidence of reasonable hours worked multiplied by a reasonable hourly rate, yielding a base figure that can be adjusted by considerations not already accounted for in either the hours worked or the rate. [read post]
16 May 2019, 10:21 am
& COM. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
When a fee claimant seeks to recover attorney's fees from an opposing party, it must put on evidence of reasonable hours worked multiplied by a reasonable hourly rate, yielding a base figure that can be adjusted by considerations not already accounted for in either the hours worked or the rate. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 1:49 pm
[Right, one of the distinctions to be made here is the puppy mill v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:05 am
Miller, which addressed police access to business records held by third parties; Smith v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:57 pm
& COM. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 5:59 am
Other examples include MP3.com,3UMG Recordings v MP3.Com, 92 F.Supp.2d 349 (SDNY 2000) (“although defendant seeks to portray its service as the ‘functional equivalent’ of storing its subscribers’ CDs, in actuality defendant is re-playing for the subscribers converted versions of the recordings it copied, without authorization, from plaintiffs’ copyrighted CDs. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 5:37 pm
Demonstrate familiarity with third party certification frameworks.5. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am
, Haney v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 1:16 pm
(Canfield v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 4:07 pm
CG v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 10:12 pm
Rice v. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 1:48 pm
Piatetsky’s age, his lack of family history of colon cancer, Frank’s review of medical records, testimony, and work records, as warranting Frank’s causal inference. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm
Csepanyi, a medical doctor working at Pioneer and another named defendant. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 5:00 am
See Op. at 7 citing Com. v. [read post]
