Search for: "Worthy v. Michigan" Results 21 - 40 of 101
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2021, 7:20 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Michigan sought en banc review, and the court split 8-7, with two judges (Sutton and Kethledge) writing that the panel decision was wrong, but not en banc worthy. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Benjamin EidelsonThis post offers preliminary analysis of DHS v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 10:48 am by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
Supreme Court handed down its opinion in Tinker v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Doron Dorfman, Syracuse University College of Law, Of Worthy and Worthier Blood: Gay Families, Anti-HIV Medication, and the Blood Ban Doriane Lambelet Coleman, Duke Law School, Legal Issues in Decision-making for Adolescents Who Seek Gender Affirming Care F. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:56 pm by Anthony Gaughan
” But as the Supreme Court’s ruling in Bush v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 10:49 am by bryannewland
That Consent Decree addresses a number of issues, and requires Enbridge to take steps to improve the safety of its pipelines – a worthy objective. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 12:59 pm by Eugene Volokh
Smith (who has also helped us with Michigan cases) — have just filed a friend-of-the-court brief in one of the latest cases in the Aaron Walker/Brett Kimberlin saga. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 10:21 am by Meg Kribble
MATRIX, working in cooperation with the African Studies Center at Michigan State University, is partnering with universities and cultural heritage organizations in Africa to build this resource. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 6:53 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Two Michigan cases in 2003, Gratz v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 11:29 am by Andrew Hamm
Douglas Smith looks at Evenwel v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:50 am by Joy Waltemath
” Noting that the Sixth Circuit then rejected the position that a transgender person is somehow less worthy of Title VII protection as to a sex stereotyping claim, the court here also cited Barnes v. [read post]