Search for: "XYZ-1 Corp." Results 21 - 40 of 45
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm by Schachtman
Lautrec, Ltd., 2003 WL 23512133, at *1 (Mich. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Everest Minerals Corp., 362 F. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
"[1] Indeed, as noted above, the right of access to court records[2]—and, in the view of many courts, the right of access to parties' names—is a "clear and strong First Amendment interest. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
I'll begin by laying out a few categories of situations where the risk of reputational harm is especially serious, and then summarize the state of court decisions on the subject. [1.] [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 5:49 am by Eugene Volokh
The Options Courts generally disfavor pseudonymous litigation, but sometimes allow it.1 Indeed, they sometimes themselves pseudonymize cases for publication, even when the party names remain in the court records.2 Both courts and parties also sometimes pseudonymize the names of nonlitigant witnesses and victims. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 7:57 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Interstate Johnson/Lane Corp.) in which employees had agreed to bilateral arbitration and in which it could have been argued that the NLRA makes such an agreement unlawful. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 7:57 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Interstate Johnson/Lane Corp.) in which employees had agreed to bilateral arbitration and in which it could have been argued that the NLRA makes such an agreement unlawful. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:34 am by Peter Mahler
Potential client sits down with business divorce lawyer and says, “I’m a minority shareholder in XYZ Corp. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am by Eugene Volokh
Pseudonymity can also cause difficulties in the fact-finding process, especially as the case gets closer to trial. [1.] [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Last week, Google received two requests that it remove that post from its indexes—and thus vanish it from search results—on the theory that the post violated the copyright in a Tumblr post, https://www.tumblr.com/case49news/745091056157196289/fourth-circuit-on-one-sided-pseudonymity-in-sexual: Re: Unknown NOTICE TYPE: DMCA Copyright claim 1 KIND OF WORK: Unspecified DESCRIPTION    The decision allows such pseudonymity when the defendant has already been found (by… [read post]