Search for: "YOUNG v. CHAPMAN" Results 21 - 40 of 58
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2016, 3:32 am
& 3 Ors v Chocosuisse Union Des Fabricants Suisses  [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 4:16 pm by Hannah Kiddoo
He added that one way to ensure that only the guilty are convicted is to uphold the promise of Gideon v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 6:54 pm by Schachtman
Supp. 2d 1345, 1367 (S.D.Fla.2011), aff’d, Chapman v. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
Maxine Carr had been arrested on 17 Aug 2002, on suspicion of providing her partner Ian Huntley with a false alibi at the time of the murders of two young Soham girls, Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:46 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Consider some of the early strict liability cases, the ones characterized more as warranty cases than as the tort of strict liability:  Chapman v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 11:06 am by Dan Markel
Ryan (Southern Methodist University)   Criminal Justice 09: Criminal Law Stories Time: Fri, Jun 8 - 2:30pm - 4:15pm Place: HHV, TBA20  Session Participants: Chair: Donna Coker (University of Miami) The Story of Wanrow: Reasonableness, Gender, and Self-Defense *Donna Coker (University of Miami) Accomplice Liability and the Murderous Judge *Leo Katz (University of Pennsylvania) Robinson v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:12 am by Dan Markel
; the ASU Young Scholars gathering in mid-March; and the Law and Society Crimprof shadow conference. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of visiting Professor Jack Goldsmith’s “Foreign Relations Law” class, which is studying Hamdan v. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 2:41 am by 1 Crown Office Row
  In relation to sentencing in the Crown Court, there was some Court of Appeal authority on sentencing which arose from riots in Bradford, West Yorkshire back in 2001 – see R v Chapman 2002 and R v Najeeb 2003. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 2:38 am by Liam Thornton
Relying in particular on the European Court of Human Rights judgment in Chapman v United Kingdom, Charleton J. refused the relief sought, noting that there was no obligation under the ECHR to provide persons with a particular form, type or standard of accommodation. [read post]