Search for: "Young v. Employment Dept." Results 21 - 40 of 55
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2023, 4:53 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
In Murray v Beard (102 NY 505 [1886]), the same Court ruled: An agent is held to uberrima fides in his dealings with his principal; and if he acts adversely to his employer in any part of the transaction, or omits to disclose any interest which would naturally influence his conduct in dealing with the subject of the employment, it amounts to such a fraud upon the principal as to forfeit any right to compensation for services. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm by Joel R. Brandes
In addition, certain employees may reside at their employers’ homes including au pairs, household help, and home aides. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
Slip Op. 05523 (2d Dept., 2019) the parties were married in July 2006 and had two minor children, Liya L. and Emery L. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
” This blog’s analysis of Tuesday’s argument in North Carolina Dept of Revenue v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 5:10 am by Heidi Henson
In 2003, in Nevada Dept of Human Resources v Hibbs, the Supreme Court ruled that Congress validly abrogated state sovereign immunity from claims under the FMLA’s family care provision in subparagraph (C). [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:02 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Deborah L. Brake
It also ruled in Los Angeles Dept. of Water and Power v. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
Higgenbotham Areas of Law: Aviation, Government & Administrative Law, Labor & Employment Law Thomas E. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 4:38 am by The Public Employment Law Press
”** See, also, Decisions of the Commissioner Number 13,433 in which the Commissioner cites Appeal of Chaney, 33 Ed Dept Rep 12; Young v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:18 am by Joel R. Brandes
Best Interest of Child Outweighed Application of Exclusionary Rule in Custody Case In Matter of Young v Young, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2010 WL 6622106 (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept.) the Appellate Division affirmed an order which awarded the father sole custody of the parties child. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 9:12 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
In 2003, in Nevada Dept of Human Resources v Hibbs (84 EPD ¶41,391), the Supreme Court ruled that Congress validly abrogated state sovereign immunity from claims under the FMLA’s family care provision in subparagraph (C). [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 11:29 pm by Joel R. Brandes
In Drumm v Drumm, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 4975452 (N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept.) [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 9:51 am
Eli Lilly and Company - employment issues, more coming Marietta Squibb v. [read post]