Search for: "Young v. Norris"
Results 21 - 40
of 52
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2016, 2:46 pm
Ernst & Young, LLP, No. 13-16599, 2016 WL 4433080 (9th Cir. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 12:43 pm
In Morris v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 8:24 am
In Quilloin v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 8:24 am
In Quilloin v. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 2:11 pm
This is a guest post by Allan Norman of Celtic Knot following the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of The Christian Institute and others (Appellants) v The Lord Advocate (Respondent) (Scotland) [2016] UKSC 51. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:42 pm
Ernst & Young, LLP (2d Cir. 2013) 726 F.3d 290, 297 fn. 8; Owen v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:03 pm
On 17 February 2014, Mr Justice Nicholas Kearns heard an application for disclosure in the case of Norris v Burke. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Wheelahan v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
(Sierra Club, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 12:27 pm
v=155483654580878&saved The timeline and press statement contained two major untruths, misstatements the press corps treated as true because they had no alternative. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 4:02 am
Magistrates’ Court: the Legacy of Norris v USA (No 2) In reaching his decision, DJ Evans relied upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in Norris v USA [2010] 2 AC 487, which concerned the extradition of a 66 year old man with poor health whose wife could not accompany him upon extradition due to her ill health. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:00 am
v=NsJHqstPuNo UPDATE: Governor Branstad signed the bill into law. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm
Cal. 2004) Norris v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 8:32 am
District Judge Purdy noted, Very powerful observations do come from Lord Phillips, PSC in Norris v USA [2010] UKSC 9 (@ para 67) … His Lordship said “extradition proceedings should not become the occasion for a debate about the most convenient forum for criminal proceedings…Unless the judge reaches the conclusion that the scales are finely balanced he should not enter into any enquiry as to the possibility of prosecution in this country. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 1:01 am
The words “that was applicable” were analysed by the House of Lords (now the Supreme Court) in Regina v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 2:52 pm
Norris, 2011 Ark. 49 (Danielson, J., dissenting). [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 2:44 pm
Norris, 2011 Ark. 49 (Danielson, J., dissenting). [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 12:40 pm
Norris, 2011 Ark. 49 (Danielson, J., dissenting). [read post]
