Search for: "(I) Clement" Results 381 - 400 of 1,504
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2017, 8:16 am by Tejinder Singh
Clements, in 2012, Gorsuch wrote an opinion holding that a state prisoner’s First Amendment retaliation claim, which sought prospective relief, did not run afoul of the Eleventh Amendment. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 1:28 am by Daniel Clement
The post Who Gets the Dog in a New York Divorce: New York Pet Custody appeared first on Clement Law. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 1:28 am by Daniel Clement
The post Who Gets the Dog in a New York Divorce: New York Pet Custody appeared first on Clement Law. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 1:28 am by Daniel Clement
The post Who Gets the Dog in a New York Divorce: New York Pet Custody appeared first on Clement Law. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 3:16 am by Ben
On appeal the High Court told ITV that the Tribunal  "had not made an error of law in reaching its decision".Commenting on the decision, PRS Commercial Director Paul Clements said: "In June 2016, the copyright tribunal decided a dispute over the terms of ITV's broadcast licence in PRS For Music's favour. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 3:29 am by Walter Olson
I’ve written about Antonin Scalia’s role in the late 1970s and early 1980s as editor of Regulation magazine, and more references to his work there came up at several panels during the recent Federalist Society lawyers convention, all worth watching for their own sake: antitrust (with Judges Doug Ginsburg, Frank Easterbrook (mentioning Regulation at 16:00), et al.), administrative law (Eugene Scalia, same, at 4:25+), and statutory interpretation (Paul Clement, same, at… [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In the past half-century, John Tower (1989) appears to be the only Cabinet nominee to be voted down by the Senate, whereas Supreme Court nominees Clement Haynsworth (1969), G. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 7:37 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
That a simplified version of the P&I Clause but the point is that it ensures "the citizens of the United States [are] one people, by placing the citizens of each State upon the same footing with citizens of other States," even if people in those other states elect someone that we despise to the White House.The case is Clement v. [read post]