Search for: "*king v. U. S"
Results 381 - 400
of 575
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2021, 4:30 am
The Eikenberry Case A recent decision by Kings County Commercial Division Justice Leon Ruchelsman, Eikenberry v Lamson, 2020 NY Slip Op 33992(U) [Kings County Nov. 30, 2020], is a fine springboard for exploring the application of these legal standards to business divorce litigation where (as is often the case) the injunction movant’s ownership status in the business is hotly contested. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 2:48 am
Caldwell v Gutman, Mintz, Baker Sonnfeldt, P.C. ; 2011 NY Slip Op 52116(U) ; Decided on November 25, 2011 ; Civil Court Of The City Of New York, Kings County ; Levine, J. give a full history of the conflict. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 2:35 pm
U. [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:36 pm
The Roots of Sexual Privacy: Warren and Brandeis & the Privacy of Intimate Life 42 Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts 383 (2019), U of Maryland Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2019-06, Danielle Keats Citron, University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 2:00 am
Tarick Loufti v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:17 am
" According to the original and superseding indictments filed in Manhattan federal court: The original indictment, United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:17 am
" According to the original and superseding indictments filed in Manhattan federal court: The original indictment, United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 8:30 am
In Skycam, LLC v. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 4:24 am
In Pascarella v Goldberg, Cohn & Richter, LLP ; 2009 NY Slip Op 52193(U) ;Decided on October 23, 2009 ; Supreme Court, Kings County ; Hinds-Radix, J. we see how the court works its way through plaintiff's claims. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 2:09 am
In Pascarella v Goldberg, Cohn & Richter, LLP ; 2009 NY Slip Op 52193(U) ; ; Supreme Court, Kings County ; Hinds-Radix, J. we see how the court works its way through plaintiff's claims. [read post]
5 May 2015, 12:01 pm
The case, United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:54 pm
Consider, for example, Riggs v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 2:15 pm
King. 500 F.3d 1335 (lIth Cir.) [read post]
16 May 2016, 3:28 am
Camuso The first is Camuso v Brooklyn Portfolio, LLC, 50 Misc 3d 1226(A), 2016 NY Slip Op 50273(U) [Sup Ct Kings County Mar. 8, 2016], which is making its second appearance on this blog. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:24 am
I’m nonetheless having difficulty giving the benefit of the doubt to most of what happened in Verkhoglyad v Benimovich, 2017 NY Slip Op 51133(U) [Sup Ct Kings County Sept. 12, 2017], a case recently decided by the Brooklyn Supreme Court in which it denied enforcement of a mandatory forum selection clause, disregarded the operating agreement’s New Jersey choice-of-law provision by applying New York law to… [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:24 am
I’m nonetheless having difficulty giving the benefit of the doubt to most of what happened in Verkhoglyad v Benimovich, 2017 NY Slip Op 51133(U) [Sup Ct Kings County Sept. 12, 2017], a case recently decided by the Brooklyn Supreme Court in which it denied enforcement of a mandatory forum selection clause, disregarded the operating agreement’s New Jersey choice-of-law provision by applying New York law to… [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 1:18 pm
Returning relists We begin this week with the sole holdover from last term, which thus begins OT2016 as the new term’s relist king. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:15 am
(2) Behar v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 11:03 pm
Cohen, 2013 NY Slip Op 50092(U) (Sup Ct Kings County Jan. 15, 2013), decided last month by Brooklyn Commercial Division Justice Carolyn E. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 11:59 am
Colleen V. [read post]
