Search for: "1-16 Does" Results 381 - 400 of 18,929
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2019, 8:13 am by Jon Sands
Martinez-Hernandez, No. 16-50423(1-9-19) (Hurwitz w/Rawlinson & Melloy). [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 4:55 am
G 1/03 and G 1/16 established that an undisclosed disclaimer may be introduced into the claims to restore novelty in view of an accidental anticipation. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 10:22 pm
As of January 1, 2007 the fees went up to $310.00 a month.That calculates to an approximate 16% increase then a 64% increase. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 6:42 am by Jacquelyn Greene
The Juvenile Justice Reinvestment Act (JJRA), which raised the age of juvenile court jurisdiction to include youth who commit offenses at ages 16 and 17, went into effect on December 1, 2019. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 12:19 pm by emagraken
Chiu, 2014 BCSC 75 at para. 7. [15]         Incurring a disbursement is not a formal step as contemplated by the Civil Rules. [16]          I, therefore, conclude that under Rule 9-1(5)(b), double disbursements are not to be awarded as part of double costs. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 6:58 pm
"Having health insurance does not mean you will receive healthcare when you need it," he said. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
The post Does Fair Use Provide a Celebrity Right to Plagiarize? [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 5:08 pm by Jacek Stramski
On June 16, 2014, a Petition was filed with the Florida Supreme Court, Case SC14-1165, to amend Rule 1-7.3 to provide authority to The Florida Bar to increase the membership fee cap by $100 per year earmarked specifically for The Florida Bar Foundation, an entirely separate 501(c)(3) non-profit public charity. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 3:43 pm
 [16]        Having found that s. 46(1)(b) applies, it is unnecessary to consider s. 46(1)(c). [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:01 pm by oliver randl
Irrespective of whether its priority is valid or not, in particular as regards its claim 3 and Example C6, in the board’s view it does not anticipate the subject-matter of claim 1 of this request. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 pm by Dennis Crouch
  The PTAB instituted, but only to claims 1-15 and 17-18 — the case against Claim 16 was not strong enough. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 5:34 pm by Dennis Hursh
But at least we know that quantitative easing has occurred without triggering high inflation. 1. [read post]
18 Apr 2021, 6:48 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
That does not mean there will not be other challenges in the works. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 9:00 pm by clc-admin
The expected dates of proclamation are as follows: July 1, 2018 for the amendments to modernize the Act and the holdback rules; and October 1, 2019 for the amendments related to prompt payment, adjudication and liens against municipalities. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 8:31 am by Bob Karl
  The rule does not, and will not, impact parties who acquire(d) properties between November 1, 2005 and October 16, 2015 (final rule effective date) and used the 2005 ASTM Standard to comply with the AAI rule   What Does it All Mean? [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
§ 1-52(16) (Lexis 2013) ('[N]o cause of action shall accrue more than 10 years from the last act or omission of the defendant giving rise to the cause of action'); Robinson v. [read post]