Search for: "Abid v. Abid" Results 381 - 400 of 3,774
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2010, 10:04 am by INFORRM
  The defence of fair comment was last considered by the House of Lords in Telnikoff v Matusevitch ([1992] 2 AC 343). [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 4:02 am by Philip Thomas
Tab Turner and others in Jasper County Chancery Court, seeking to force Turner to abide by a 2006 attorney-fee sharing agreement. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 11:59 am by karen
Police Have Collected Data on Millions of Law-Abiding Drivers Via License ReadersSan Francisco, California—The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and the ACLU won a decision by the California Supreme Court that the license plate data of millions of law-abiding drivers, collected indiscriminately by police across the state, are not “investigative records” that law enforcement can keep secret. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 6:30 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
  On the first issue, the Court of Appeals notes that the Supreme Court in the landmark Heller v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 7:26 pm by Maureen Johnston
The petition of the day is: Jackson v. [read post]
3 Nov 2007, 9:23 am
United States v. de Perez, No. 07-CR-361-1 (JBW), 2007 WL 3010587 (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 5:04 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Con el fin de brindar mayor seguridad a las víctimas de violencia doméstica, la Cámara de Representantes, en Sesión Ordinaria, aprobó de forma unánime una medida que le permite a las víctimas de violencia doméstica detectar la presencia del agresor sujeto a supervisión electrónica a través de aplicaciones en los celulares. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 12:16 pm by Lyle Roberts
  In Lehmann v OHR Pharmaceutical, Inc. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:35 am
Supreme Court's decision in favor of the Second Amendment in D.C. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
A good lawyer who abides by the Rules of Professional Conduct cannot disclose any information about the business or affairs of his or her client except in very limited and specified circumstances, such as where there is an imminent risk of death or serious bodily harm, and disclosure is necessary to prevent the death or harm. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 8:09 am by Kevin Russell
Yesterday, the Court heard oral argument in Kawashima v. [read post]