Search for: "Asbestos Products Liability v."
Results 381 - 400
of 552
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2019, 8:29 am
Daubert hearings are common in mass torts, particularly those in mesothelioma product liability lawsuits, as they involve issues of exposure and causation – key to establishing liability in this multi-district litigation. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 5:21 am
Sinclair v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 4:38 am
The trial judge reduced the damages to $6,000,000 for pain and suffering and $600,000 for loss of consortium, In Nemeth v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 12:54 pm
Co. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(Think about the tertiary asbestos defendants, for example.) [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:18 am
Railroad Friction Products Corp., which I previewed earlier this week. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 1:09 pm
In general, chrysotile was used for textiles, roofing materials, asbestos cements, brake and friction products, fillers for plastics, etc.; chrysotile with or without amosite for insulation materials; chrysotile and crocidolite for a variety of asbestos cement products. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:46 am
Co. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:04 am
As it is, we've only got a parody.Guinan is another of those lawsuits in which what are really malpractice or informed consent cases have been stretched to try to make out product liability claims. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 5:53 pm
Plenco sought coverage from Liberty Mutual for thousands of asbestos liability claims arising out of the insured’s sale of products containing asbestos between 1950 and 1983. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:51 pm
The Court of Appeal in O’Neil ruled that defendants could be liable because they could have foreseen that the Navy would use asbestos-containing products in conjunction with the defendants’ products, but the defendants argue (and four California appellate courts have agreed) that they cannot be liable because they did not place the injury-causing asbestos products into the steam of commerce, and merely supplied components that the Navy… [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 6:16 am
Asbestos presented a unique and compelling case for recovery for a number of reasons: it is responsible for hundreds of thousands of deaths, asbestosis and mesothelioma are diseases solely caused by asbestos exposure, an OSHA standard requires employers to provide protective clothing and changing rooms to prevent take-home exposures, and strict products liability theory may be used because asbestos is a “product. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 2:00 pm
Co. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 6:51 am
Riegel v. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 5:49 am
When an asbestos manufacturer sold asbestos to a sophisticated intermediary -- the Navy -- the manufacturer could be absolved of liability for the Navy's failure to warn its employees of the product's danger. [read post]
6 May 2024, 10:00 pm
Check out this expertly drafted practice note discussing companies that file bankruptcy to address their mass-tort liabilities. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
The court in Orso v. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 8:20 am
What follows is our annual list of the ten worst court decisions of the year (2015) arising from prescription medical product liability litigation – often with reasoning worthy of tracker jacker venom. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 7:49 am
She and her husband brought claims in Pennsylvania state court for negligence, products liability, and strict liability against Accuratus and Materion Brush Inc., the husband’s second employer. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 9:46 pm
Chesterton Company: the plaintiff claimed that her husband was exposed to asbestos in airborne dust and his use of asbestos-containing products while working at power plants. [read post]
