Search for: "Baker v. Stewart"
Results 381 - 400
of 452
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2014, 7:00 am
” Here’s Stewart Baker announcing the winners. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 10:04 am
(Stewart Baker) As 2013 ended and 2014 began, privacy professionals took a moment to look back and choose the year’s most dubious achievements in privacy law. [read post]
Last Chance to Vote for the 2014 Privies — Plus Sebelius v. Reding for Privacy Hypocrite of the Year
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
(Stewart Baker) Voting for the 2014 Privy Awards for Dubious Achievement in Privacy Law will close at noon EST tomorrow, January 1, 2014. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 8:35 am
(Stewart Baker) As voting continues for the 2014 Privy Awards, here’s a peek at another closely watched matchup. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 11:46 am
(Stewart Baker) Voting continues in the Privy Award for Privacy Hypocrite of the Year, which features a partisan matchup. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 2:01 pm
(Stewart Baker) The 2014 Privies – Category Three Dumbest Privacy Case of the Year a. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 7:00 am
Oral arguments in Hatim v. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 8:00 am
” Arguing for are Stewart Baker and Richard Falkenrather. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 5:15 am
Here, the Volokh Conspiracy’s Stewart Baker notes some questionable methodology in a study that purports that Girl Talk’s 2010 album All Day — created primarily using hundreds of samples of existing sound recordings without permission — led to a massive increase in sales of the songs that were sampled. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:26 am
The House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence was to have had a hearing today on proposed reforms to the NSA surveillance programs. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 1:33 pm
(Stewart Baker) Following up on my earlier NIST post, it’s fair to ask why I think the NIST Cybersecurity Framework will be a regulatory disaster. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:48 am
Id. at *7 (citing Baker v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
Yesterday, Steptoe & Johnson’s Stewart Baker wrote an op-ed in USA Today voicing support for the NSA surveillance programs. [read post]
10 Aug 2013, 8:00 am
Jack sought to resolve the latter dilemma later, and responded to comments by the Volokh Conspiracy’s Stewart Baker. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:56 am
Be sure to read Stewart Baker’s post at Volokh Conspiracy in response to DNI Clapper’s statement, as well as Orin Kerr’s post at the same blog focusing on the legal standard Clapper invoked in his statement—the Terry v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 2:44 am
Stewart Baker points to a provision in Congress’s continuing resolution that is the first serious attempt I have seen to punish (as opposed to rail against) China for its cybersecurity practices. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:51 am
For a while, there was a mismatch, but what happened was that courts began to understand that fabric designs weren’t going to give them what they needed to handle software, so they reached back to Baker v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
Dennis Blair, and former General Counsel for the National Security Agency, Stewart Baker, have claimed that the law of war is “inadequate” or “irrelevant” in the context of cyber conflict (Nakashima, 2010; Gjelten, 2010). [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 3:16 pm
We have R v Stewart in the Supreme Court of Canada in 1988, holding that information as such could not be stolen because there was no property in it. [read post]
