Search for: "Barris v. United States" Results 381 - 400 of 663
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2012, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Here are the articles (full access is limited to subscribers):Laura Weinrib (University of Chicago), "The Sex Side of Civil Liberties: United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 6:24 am by Conor McEvily
United States, the Court will consider whether four key provisions of S.B. 1070, Arizona’s immigration law, are preempted by federal law. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  Here is the abstract:Harlan Fiske StoneJustice Harlan Fiske Stone's majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 8:37 am by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: Justice Harlan Fiske Stone's majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 1:32 pm by Rachel Price
United States http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/10-1259.pdf (23 January 2012) This judgment has been hailed by commentators as one of the most significant Fourth Amendment decisions of the decade. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 2:33 pm by Howard Knopf
Glover, they do not correctly state “the law as it stands in the United States”. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 7:57 am by Rob Robinson
 bit.ly/zpfcer (Elkan Abramowitz, Barry Bohrer) Reports and Resources Classified National Security Information Program for State, Local, Tribal and Private Sector (PDF) 1.usa.gov/yzxOby (Homeland Security) comScore Releases February 2012 U.S. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:46 am by Lawrence Solum
If that placement is correct, then Hughes visited Roberts before Roberts cast his vote in Tipaldo; before both Hughes and Roberts voted to invalidate the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933 in United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:30 am by Dan Ernst
If that placement is correct, then Hughes visited Roberts before Roberts cast his vote in Tipaldo; before both Hughes and Roberts voted to invalidate the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933 in United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 12:36 am by INFORRM
He then proceeded consider the case law from Ontario and other Canadian jurisdictions, as well as the United States, England and Wales, Australia and New Zealand. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 2:59 pm by David Lat
Professors Richard Epstein (left) and John Yoo * Are you still trying to make sense of the conflicting opinions in United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 11:58 am by Joshua Matz
Last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:50 am by Danielle Citron
The Supreme Court’s decision last week in United States v. [read post]