Search for: "Becton, Dickinson "
Results 381 - 400
of 446
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2010, 11:57 am
Becton, Dickinson and Co., No. 08-1511 (April 26, 2010, order)During proseuction before the USPTO, the patentee made certain representations to the examiner regarding the patent claims and the prior art. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 10:36 am
Becton Dickinson and Co., which issued January 25, 2010. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:23 am
Becton, Dickinson and Co. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 1:28 pm
Becton, Dickinson & Co. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 3:04 am
USPTO and Myriad Genetics (Docket Report) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) (Holman's Biotech IP Blog) (Patent Docs) (Ladas & Parry) (Tech Transfer Blog) (ipwars.com) (Ars Technica) (BlawgIT) (IP Watch) (The Prior Art) US: Study suggests USPTO erred in broad claims of Myriad BRCA1 patent (Tech Transfer Blog) (Patent Docs) US: CAFC confirms written description requirement in Ariad v Lilly (IP Law Blog) (IP Osgoode) (IP Spotlight) (Ars Technica) US: Justifying… [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 2:40 am
The April 9th hearing will be held at Boston University School of Law (see posting here).April 1, 2010 - 2 PM: In re Becton, Dickinson & Company, Serial No. 77254637 [Refusal to register the product design shown below, comprising a three-dimensional configuration of a closure for medical collection tubes, for "closures for medical collection tubes" on the ground of functionality under Section 2(e)(5), or alternatively failure to function as a trademark].April 6, 2010… [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:58 am
Dickstein Shapiro (Patently-O) ITC: No s 337 violation; investigation terminated in Certain Semiconductor Integration Circuits Using Tungsten Metallization and Products Containing Same involving complainants LSI and Agere (ITC 337 Law Blog) Fleshing out design patent infringement doctrine: Crocs v ITC (Patently-O) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Billingnetwork Patent – Court orders plaintiff to file separate patent suits against each defendant: Billingnetwork Patent, Inc… [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 1:13 pm
"In July of 1990, Jeffrey and Claudia Griffin conceived of the idea of using a scratch-off label to mark beverage containers and cups so that attendees of a gathering or party could keep track of their beverage cups. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 8:36 am
Becton, Dickinson & Co. et al. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 7:49 am
Among the companies that have successfully used the (i)(9) argument to exclude special meeting proposals are: CVS Caremark, Medco, Goldman Sachs, Honeywell, NiSource, Baker Hughes, Becton Dickinson & Co., Eastman Chemical, Safeway, Dow Chemical, Pfizer, Chevron, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Time Warner. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 4:31 am
On Dec. 22, the staff rejected his request to reverse its Becton Dickinson decision. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 6:57 am
Becton Dickinson and Co. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 2:48 am
Abbott sued Beckton, Dickinson and Company and Nova Biomedical for infringing 5,628,890, which claims a glucose sensor. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 4:25 am
Becton, Dickinson and Co (case no. 2009-1511) (Patently-O) CAFC: Jury wrong on anticipation; but claims are obvious as a matter of law: Therasense, Inc. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 1:25 am
Becton, Dickinson and Company threw down a declaratory judgment (DJ) action on competitor Abbott over a couple other patents. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 9:31 am
Becton, Dickinson and Co. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 7:49 am
Becton, Dickinson & Co., No. 2008-1511 (Fed. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 11:17 am
Becton, Dickinson and Co. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 10:36 am
On Dec. 22, the staff rejected his request to reverse its Becton Dickinson decision. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v Samsung Elecs. [read post]
