Search for: "Bies v. State"
Results 381 - 400
of 778
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2014, 11:47 am
Many doctors thought the 2004 ultrasound should’ve been classified as at least BI RADS 3 probably benign, rather than BI RADS 2 benign. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 12:53 pm
On July 21, 2014, in Felczer v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 4:06 am
The European Court of Human Rights released its opinion in the case of Trabelsi v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 6:40 am
Here is the opinion in Nouri v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:26 am
The court thus granted in part the government’s motion to dismiss (Martin v The United States, July 31, 2014, Campbell-Smith, P). [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 6:36 am
The recent case of Hardy v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 6:03 am
” Under the UK Bribery Act, policies are discussed in the Six Principles of an Adequate Procedures compliance program under Principle V – Communication, where it states “The business seeks to ensure that its bribery prevention policies and procedures are embedded and understood throughout the company through internal and external communication, including training, that is proportionate to the risks it faces. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 4:34 am
It appears that Fokker deliberately misused this exception to justify shipments from the United States. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:32 am
For example, as was stated in Generics (UK) Limited and others v H Lundbeck A/S [2009] UKHL 12: “National courts may reach different conclusions as to the evaluation of the evidence in the light of the relevant principles, but the principles themselves should be the same, stemming as they do from the EPC. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:30 pm
In its much anticipated decision in National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
25 May 2014, 5:30 am
http://t.co/7e8CRTEkIT -> Identity not disclosed for privacy reasons DIGITAL MUSIC NEWS LLC v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 3:59 am
In R v Legal Aid Board, ex p Kaim Todner ([1999] QB 966), the Court stated that it was important not to forget why proceedings need to be held under the full glare of a public hearing because there was a natural tendency for the general principle to be eroded. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 11:34 am
State v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 12:51 pm
Last year, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit decided largely in favour of Mr. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 11:10 am
Earlier today, a number of international and foreign associations and copyright scholars filed an Amicus brief in the Supreme Court of the United States in the ABC, Inc. et al v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 12:36 pm
Lorin and U.S. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 1:30 am
Celine Camara, Doctoral candidate, Researcher at the Max-Planck Institute, Discrimination against Third State Nationals in Regulation 2201/2003 “Brussels II bis”. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 5:49 am
Contrary to the petitioner's contention, she failed to establish that she exhausted the alleged tortfeasor's policy through settlement (see Garcia v State Farm Ins. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 2:05 am
Related posts:Kinsch on Choice of Law and the Prohibition of Discrimination Brussels II bis: Its Impact and Application in the Member States Kinsch on Recent ECHR Cases Relating to PIL [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
Windsor, and to the federal immigration agencies (USCIS and the State Department) that quickly responded by according equal treatment under the immigration laws to same-gender bi-national couples as have long been enjoyed by heterosexual spouses. [read post]
