Search for: "Board of Trade v. United States" Results 381 - 400 of 2,209
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2018, 3:01 pm by James Hastings
” To establish priority of use, a party must show that its owns a mark or trade name previously used in the United States and not abandoned. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:32 pm
 The Cancellation Division dismissed the application, just as the Board of Appeal dismissed the appeal and the GC dismissed the action against the decision of the Board of Appeal. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 8:00 am
Culliver (09-158) - originally Conference 11.6 [involves lawyers from Akin Gump and Howe & Russell] United States Defense Department v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 5:49 am
In a rare, contested concurrent use proceeding, the Board awarded junior user ABF concurrent use registrations for the three marks shown below, for hotel and motel services, in the entire United States except for the State of Arizona. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 6:39 pm by Scott M. Daniels
International Trade Commission alleging that Vizio and a number of other manufacturers had violated Section 337 through the importation into the United States of digital television sets that infringed Funai’s U.S. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am by Eleonora Rosati
UKIPO says no but EUIPO Board of Appeal says yesDanny Boy Label’s TITANIC registrations O/050/21 (UKIPO, January 2021) and R0109-2020-1 (EUIPO Board of Appeal, November 2020)Just how much use is enough to prove genuine use? [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 8:13 am by Adam Gillette
For reasons that I am too lazy to look up, the decision that the Supreme Court overturned is not from a Circuit Court of Appeals but from a panel of one judge from the United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit and two from the United States District Court for the District of Kansas. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 11:34 am by Marty Schwimmer
UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES RELATING TO INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHTS AND TRADE MARKS BY CERTAIN INTERNET SITES. [read post]