Search for: "Brett v. State" Results 381 - 400 of 2,081
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2022, 8:05 am by Tom Smith
An armed would-be assassin’s alleged attempt on the life of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh last week is part of a wave of violence, arson, vandalism, and intimidation targeting pro-life groups and government officials since the leak last month of a draft Supreme Court opinion that would overturn Roe v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 8:05 am by Tom Smith
An armed would-be assassin’s alleged attempt on the life of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh last week is part of a wave of violence, arson, vandalism, and intimidation targeting pro-life groups and government officials since the leak last month of a draft Supreme Court opinion that would overturn Roe v. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm by Cary Coglianese
Judges and scholars found confusing, for example, the Court’s 2001 decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 8:52 am by jonathanturley
., joined the growing ranks of members of Congress in issuing a warning to the Supreme Court: reaffirm Roe v. [read post]
On the assumption that five Supreme Court Justices—Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett—are prepared to overrule Roe v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 11:56 am by Benjamin Pollard
Roger Parloff discussed the legal landscape for Section 3 of the 14th amendment cases in light of the ruling in Cawthorn v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
  If a claimant has lied in their pleadings or evidence, they could face contempt proceedings or a prosecution for perjury – rare, but not unheard of (see R v Jeffrey Archer and R v Jonathan Aitkin). [read post]
21 May 2022, 5:28 am by Just Security
by Iris Malone (@irisemalone) Technology Policy A Quantum Sputnik Moment by Nima Leclerc Surveillance and Reproductive Rights With Roe v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
That was the knock, of course, on the infamous (and thoroughly discredited) Bush v. [read post]