Search for: "C. G., Matter of" Results 381 - 400 of 3,607
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
According to the wording of R 76(2)(c) it is sufficient to indicate the evidence within the nine-month TFO. [read post]
30 May 2014, 3:14 pm by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
There are allegations of improprieties by the agent in its handling of the matter; and h. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Kristi L. Wolff
In determining “whether any advertising concerning a food or food product is false or misleading,” courts must also consider factors including—but not limited to—the following: “(a) subject matter; (b) visual content; (c) use of animated characters or child-oriented activities and incentives; (d) music or other audio content; (e) age of models; (f) presence of child celebrities or celebrities who appeal to children; (g) language; (h) competent… [read post]
4 May 2007, 2:56 am
[O]ther prior art references that fail to suggest a G+C content of greater than 60 percent . . . do little to offset the clear suggestion in the Barton application that complete codon substitution would rease in the G+C content of the codons in the genetic sequence. . . . [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 1:12 am
 Yet every now and then it seems to tie itself up on a procedural matter, such as this case. [read post]
11 May 2021, 8:54 am by Roel van Woudenberg
With a further letter dated 10 November 2020, the patent proprietor clarified its requests and submitted sets of claims G-J and G'-I'.XIII. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The referral is pending as case G 2/12. [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 6:55 am by Dr Rose Hughes
 Crucially, the claim specified that the material exhibited a surface area defined by one of three open-ranges: >150 m²/g after calcining at 900°C for 2 hours; >85 m²/g after calcining at 1000°C for 4 hours; or >40 m²/g after calcining at 1100°C for 5 hours. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 1:24 pm by Eric Goldman
Today, I testified remotely before the Colombian Constitutional Court in the case of Esperanza Gómez Silva c. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
It is noted that many forms of medicaments, e.g. in the form of tablets or pills, can be administered by the patient himself.As stated at the beginning of G 1/07 [4.1], “[i]t is established in the jurisprudence of the boards of appeal that a claim encompassing an embodiment which is excluded from patentability under now A 53(c), then A 52(4) 1973, cannot be left unamended”. [read post]