Search for: "CALIFORNIA v. WASHINGTON"
Results 381 - 400
of 4,203
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2017, 3:32 pm
California (Indian Gaming Compact, Breach of)Davilla v. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 11:03 pm
MGM v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 3:06 pm
WHAT: Oral Argument in EFF and ACLU of Southern California v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 2:59 pm
AB 5 codifies the California Supreme Court’s decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 6:11 am
” Further coverage of the decision is available in the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal’s Washington Wire blog, Bloomberg, Politico, and Election Law Blog (also here). [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
Blue Shield of California Life & Health Ins. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
In addition, in cases such as Pike v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 4:25 pm
She represented Cherokee Nation in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 9:41 am
The justices heard oral arguments on Wednesday in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 6:19 am
This post examines an opinion from the Court of Appeals of Washington – Division 1: The Republic of Kazakhstan v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 1:18 pm
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 1:52 pm
Nelson, was upheld by the Supreme Court in Washington almost exactly a year later, with this order: “Appeal from Sup. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 11:01 am
” See U.S. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 6:58 pm
” It might seem obvious that here in Oregon, in Washington or anywhere else in the country companies have an obligation to ensure that the products they sell are safe and function properly, but manufacturers of unsafe medical devices gained unprecedented liability protection via the Supreme Court’s 2008 Riegel v Medtronic case. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:00 am
There is a Washington state case that said that Washington law applies to truckers whose home base is in Washington but who drive for the day into Oregon. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 5:30 am
Marine v. [read post]
Recent California Federal Court Rulings Muddy the Interpretation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
28 Mar 2013, 11:46 am
Now, district and appellate court judges in a single federal case pending in the Northern District of California, U.S. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 9:48 am
Washington v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 5:00 am
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on November 3, 2010 in Kwikset Corp. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 1:00 pm
Washington Mutual, Inc., 142 Cal.App.4th 1457 (2006), the court held that the CLRA did not apply to "transactions resulting in the sale of real property. [read post]
