Search for: "CHEVRON CORP" Results 381 - 400 of 714
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2013, 6:07 am by Staci Zaretsky
[Knoxville News Sentinel] Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: ABA, American Bar Association, American Bar Association / ABA, Barack Obama, Biglaw, Chevron, Chevron Corp. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 6:35 am
CanadaB.C. sex workers want voices heard in June SCC case to determine constitutionality of prostitution laws, Vancouver SunCanada's foreign service workers say they are in legal position to strike, Chronicle HeraldOttawa police sergeant not guilty of sexual assault, could still face charges under Police Services Act, The National PostUnited StatesEve of new law sees patent office receive record number of applications, ReutersAAR Corp. has case brought by shareholders tossed by judge,… [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm by Rodger Citron
Mead Corp., for example, his opinion articulated a number of factors to consider when determining the deference due an administrative agency’s interpretation of a statute it administers—thereby limiting the reach of the Court’s more straightforward (and therefore easier to apply) holding in Chevron USA, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:47 pm by Ben Cheng
At its January 4, 2013 Conference, the Court will consider petitions seeking review of issues such as the authority of the U.S. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 1:17 pm by WIMS
.; (5) Chevron Corporation; (6) Chevron U.S.A., Inc.; (7) Conocophillips Company; (8) Royal Dutch Shell PLC; (9) Shell Oil Company; (10) Peabody Energy Corporation; (11) The AES Corporation; (12) American Electric Power Company, Inc.; (13) American Electric Power Services Corporation; (14) Duke Energy Corporation; (15) DTE Energy Company; (16) Edison International; (17) Midamerican Energy Holdings Company; (18) Pinnacle West Capital Corporation; (19) The Southern… [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 11:50 am by Zoe Tillman
In an August 30 opinion (PDF), a three-judge appellate panel found that the contract between litigation outsourcing company eLawForum Corp., now called Drystone Capital Corp., and Unocal Corp., which is now a subsidiary of Chevron Corp., was "unambiguous" about what Unocal owed eLawForum for its services. [read post]