Search for: "CLS, Inc." Results 381 - 400 of 1,157
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2018, 11:39 am by John Elwood
II, § 2, Cl. 2. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 4:13 pm
Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. reinstated the inventive concept requirement Stevens had set forth in Parker v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 9:00 pm by News Desk
National Frozen Foods Corp. issued a Class I recall of individual quick frozen green beans because of potential Listeria monocytogenes contamination, according to notices posted by US Foods Inc. and the U.S. [read post]
13 Jan 2018, 6:30 pm by Embajador Microjuris al Día
Derecho a tu casa, es un proyecto legal subvencionado por el Fondo de Acceso a la Justicia, compuesto por las Clínicas de Asistencia Legal de las Escuelas de Derecho de la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Puerto Rico (PUCPR), la Universidad Interamericana de Puerto Rico (UIPR) y la Universidad de Puerto Rico, Recinto de Río Piedras (UPRRP), la Oficina Legal de la Comunidad, Inc. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 5:00 am by Gustavo Arballo
Aunque la conocemos recién ayer, el saldo va al año fiscal de 2017, y aunque su tenor es "consultivo", su importancia es mayúscula porque fija un estándar muy específico para los países del Sistema Interamericano.El comunicado de síntesis puede verse acá, y la Opinión Consultiva 24/2017 completa en este enlace (89 páginas). [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 6:18 am by Gustavo Arballo
La Corte declaró la validez de la cláusula que limita el mandato de los jueces al cumplir 75 años. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 5:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The breach of contract cl~im is dismissed as duplicative of the malpractice counterclaim (Mamoon v Dot Net inc., 135 AD3d 656, 658 [1st Dept 2016]” “Similarly, the second counterclaim for negligence is dismissed as duplicative of the legal malpractice claim (see Cusack v Greenberg Traurig. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm by Wolfgang Demino
 The last blog post on Madden v Midland Funding discussed a fresh law review article advocating that other circuits embrace the Second Circuit’s holding that assignees of national banks do not “inherit” National Bank Act protection so as to allow them to collect interest at a rate that was not usurious when charged by the bank that owned the account (thanks to federal preemption protection), but exceeded the usury limits in the state in which Midland Funding, LLC, the… [read post]