Search for: "Clark v. California" Results 381 - 400 of 692
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2013, 4:45 am by Susan Brenner
--> After a jury convicted Clark Alexander Mahoney Jr., of possessing child pornography or child erotica in violation of California Penal Code § 311.11(a), the court “granted [him] probation”. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
EPA [Jonathan Adler, Richard Faulk] Ilya Somin briefly reviews three new books on constitutional law: John McGinnis and Michael Rappaport on originalism, Randall Kennedy on affirmative action, and Clark Neily on judicial engagement [Volokh] General jurisdiction: “Justices Wrestle With Whether California Law Reaches A Mercedes Plant In Argentina” [Daniel Fisher] Home Building & Loan Ass’n v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 6:12 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Here are the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter for Monday, September 30, 2013:Kingston Penitentiary’s storied history full of notorious inmates, riots, escapes R v Griffith: What Happens When a Judge Changes His/Her Mind? [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 8:06 pm by Colin Starger
California also assumes a doctrinal signficance. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am by Bexis
Pfizer, Inc., 712 F.3d 21 (1st Cir. 2013), Aetna, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013)In 2010, the faculty at Penn State Law approved the creation of a new concept course, to be named "Elements of Law". [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 6:24 am by Lindsay Griffiths
Marshall changed the way that bankruptcy cases are managed in 2011, and EBIA v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:22 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
-M.Th.D. ten Napel,  Leiden Law School, Institute for Public Law, Section of Constitutional and Administrative Law, The Netherlands, “Religious Pluralism, Eastern Ethnical Monism and Western ‘Civic Totalism’” Nicolae V. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 1:04 pm
Clark (2002) 103 Cal.App.4th 1409, 1420 [the death of an important witness may constitute prejudice]; Stafford v. [read post]