Search for: "Correctional Officer Bell" Results 381 - 400 of 483
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2017, 2:37 pm by Mark Kantor
… After Defendant filed an application for a modification of the award, the arbitrator corrected his mathematical errors on June 21, 2017, and awarded Plaintiff $300,000.00, to be reduced by $15,702.95, for a total award of $284,297.05. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am by INFORRM
The defamation claim concerns a 2019 report titled ‘Challenging Hateful Extremism’, which was published by the Home Office, and contained a footnote referring to the Appellant’s conviction by the International Crimes Tribunal in Bangladesh for crimes against humanity. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 1:48 pm
If companies like Bell or Rogers built Canada’s answer to Hulu, Khanna explained, it would be immensely popular. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization symposium on David Pozen, The Constitution of the War on Drugs (Oxford University Press, 2024).Paul Butler Like most users of illegal drugs, I have never been caught. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 11:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
So we think that public display SDNY results are correct because D are causally responsible. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The First Sale Doctrine in the Digital Age Moderator: Karyn Temple Claggett, Associate Register of Copyrights and Director of Policy & International Affairs, United States Copyright Office Previous Copyright Office study concluded that first sale only covers distribution and thus doesn’t apply in digital context where reproductions are involved. [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
: (Spicy IP), India: DCGI preparing document to implement patent-registration linkage: (Spicy IP), New Zealand: Generic pharmaceutical companies taking advantage of NZ IP laws and medicines regulations: (International Law Office), Uganda: Cipla licenses ARV technology into Uganda: (Afro-IP), US: Money saved through generic prescriptions: (GenericsWeb), US: Government plans to keep close tab on drug patent settlements: (GenericsWeb), US: FTC reports 14 deals to delay generics in 2007:… [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The OCE is a fact-finding office and, unlike the ethics committee, cannot discipline members or issue subpoenas. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
The BBC reports on Caseby’s calls for further correction by the Guardian here. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
However, the Daily Mail has now published a correction stating: “In fact, while the Cabinet Secretary agreed that her husband should have informed her about the payment, he made no criticism of Dame Tessa“. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 12:00 am by Jim Sedor
The effect has been dramatic and continues to reverberate after he left office. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm by Robin E. Kobayashi
Cases 80, determined that defendant retained “all necessary control” over its training program, involved applicant in integral part of company’s business, provided applicant with place of work, as well as transportation to and from office, and would have paid her between $60,000.00 to $68,000.00 per year, thereby supporting finding of employee status. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Legal Beagle
The Crown Office said the report is still “under consideration” nearly four years on from when Police Scotland first referring the case to the Lord Advocate.JUDGE, SUSPENDED:Statement from the Judicial Office for Scotland on the suspension of part-time sheriff Peter WatsonSheriff Peter Watson was suspended from the office of part-time sheriff on 16 February 2015, in terms of section 34 of the Judiciary and Courts (Scotland) Act 2008. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 6:31 am by Bruce Thomas
It is always easier to ring alarm bells than to understand the technology and think about its potential. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am by Tejinder Singh
He began his practice in the Office of Legal Counsel in the U.S. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Bell, No. 05-5132, 05-6219 Habeas petition was properly dismissed where: 1) State court applied an incorrect standard of proof in denying death row inmate's ineffective assistance of counsel claim, but it reached the correct outcome; 2) the excluded testimony of a co-defendant was of a cumulative nature; and 3) the prosecutor committed harmless error in minimizing the jury's role in determining the appropriateness of a death sentence. .. [read post]