Search for: "DOES 1-100, exclusive" Results 381 - 400 of 1,951
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2021, 1:32 pm by Francesca Blackard
The husband had a pension that he testified would pay him $257.22 monthly if he retired July 1, 2020. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 2:12 pm by Christopher Tyner
”  Judge Carpenter wrote that “[c]hoosing to inject arguments of disparate treatment due to race into matters before the Court where such treatment is not at issue . . . does not further the goal of the equal [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 4:42 am by Daniel Schwartz
Here’s the new rule: Effective December 1, 2021 (and annually through December 1, 2024), any employer in Connecticut with 100 or more employees must notify any Connecticut residents about whether such employer offers to employees an “education assistance program” under federal law. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 4:42 am by Daniel Schwartz
Here’s the new rule: Effective December 1, 2021 (and annually through December 1, 2024), any employer in Connecticut with 100 or more employees must notify any Connecticut residents about whether such employer offers to employees an “education assistance program” under federal law. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
This illustrates that the general determination of tax expenditures can be rather subjective—not every tax expenditure should be viewed as spending through the tax code, but instead, some may be important elements for properly structuring the tax code so that it does not distort decision-making. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
Family Court, in crediting the mother’s testimony that she and Reymond F. were in an exclusive sexual relationship at the time the child was conceived, discredited Reymond F. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
Does this mean producers writ large or a specific or specified group? [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 1:34 pm
Curiously, Judge Kacsmaryk does not engage at all with the law on this point. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 9:13 pm by Adam Levitin
That is, if I have $100 and you have $100 and Gary Gensler has $100, our money might be pooled together to make a $300 loan to Elon Musk. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 2:32 pm by Patricia Hughes
Justice Abella, dissenting, found it to be unconstitutional, in particular because it does not include a right to strike or exclusive majoritarian representation. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 4:36 am by Chukwuma Okoli
Submission may be express, where the defendant signed a jurisdiction agreement or forum selection clause agreeing to submit all disputes to the courts of a particular legal system for adjudication either or an exclusive or non-exclusive basis. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 10:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Pasadena said this was (1) nominative fair use and (2) an expressive work protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 2:00 am by Colby Pastre
The Biden administration’s “Made in America Tax Plan” would substantially raise taxes on the foreign and domestic activities of U.S. multinationals, and Congress may consider similar approaches to raising revenue.[1] Meanwhile, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has advanced its proposals to reshape the international tax system for large multinational enterprises (MNEs).[2] The OECD proposal consists of two parts: Pillar 1 would… [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 2:22 pm by Howard Knopf
AC case on May 31, 2021 as her last case before her retirement from the SCC on July 1, 2021. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 12:54 pm by Rachel Casper
This program was part of a series we recently offered live as a collaboration with and exclusive to the Hampshire County Bar Association, a service organization composed of attorneys, and is dedicated to improving the quality of the practice of law in this county by providing support to the community, the bench and the bar on relevant local issues. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 8:37 am by Jason Gordon and Deborah Bessner
Therefore, a reasonable consumer would not reach the conclusion that “100% New Zealand Manuka Honey” is making the claim that the product consists exclusively of honey derived from Manuka. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 8:37 am by Jason Gordon and Deborah Bessner
Therefore, a reasonable consumer would not reach the conclusion that “100% New Zealand Manuka Honey” is making the claim that the product consists exclusively of honey derived from Manuka. [read post]