Search for: "DOES 1-121" Results 381 - 400 of 1,229
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2010, 9:20 am by Brian E. Barreira
There does not appear to be any time limitation on the usage of this exclusion, so in some many cases it could be wasteful (and legally actionable) to use the Section 1022 basis increase on the decedent’s principal residence without taking Section 121 into account. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 8:33 am
But what does 145(3) actually mean and demand of the Court? [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 9:18 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Fair use can serve as a gap filler, not trumped by specifics of 108 & 121. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:29 am
The Amended version of the Trade Mark Law will go into effect May 1, 2014. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 11:49 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The Court’s analysis in Brulotte, however,does not apply to a situation such as this one, in whichCongress, by creating the pediatric exclusivity period,explicitly authorized additional market exclusivity to begranted to the patent owner beyond the life of the patent.In Brulotte, anyone was free to use the patented technologyafter the patent expired. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 1:33 pm
| The new French law targeting “automated image referencing services”: does EU law allow it? [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 8:22 am
The EPO case law does not make this distinction, which may prove very important with regards to virtual reality applications. [read post]
10 May 2019, 1:07 pm by MOTP
Analysis Liberally construing Carter's brief, we interpret Carter to assert the following points: (1) The agreement does not require an arbitration order to issue before an arbitration may be initiated under the arbitration clause [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 9:03 pm by News Desk
As FDA works on solutions, the agency does not intend to enforce these provisions as they currently apply to entities or activities addressed in the guidance. [read post]
8 May 2015, 5:25 am
This Kat does not really like electronics cases, being a feline of chemical inclination, so he is enormously grateful to his colleague Daniel Richards for penning this piece about the recent decision relating to a now highly-litigated IPCom patent. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 8:55 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
”They are also recognized by Article 121-1 of the French intellectual property Code, which provides that: “The author has the right to respect for his name, his quality and his work. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
Duplessis, [1959] SCR 121, a delegated decision-maker cannot use its statutory mandate for a purpose for which that authority was not granted. [read post]